Privatised Autonomy for the Noongar People of Australia: A New Model for Indigenous Self-Government

B. D. Villiers
{"title":"Privatised Autonomy for the Noongar People of Australia: A New Model for Indigenous Self-Government","authors":"B. D. Villiers","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.86622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Aboriginal people of Australia have for many year sought rectification of past injustices. The absence of political structures whereby Aboriginal people can communicate their views; govern themselves in regard to their traditions and culture; and promote their interests in similar way as applies to other indigenous people in the world has been identified as a major shortcoming in the institutional arrangements in Australia. It is especially since 1992 when native title had first been recognised in Australia that Aboriginal people have attempted to utilise their land rights as a basis for a form of self-government or autonomy. The shortcoming of this approach is, however, that native title only exists in certain areas; native title is a relative weak right; and native title does not entail any self-governance rights. Recently the federal state of Western Australia broke new ground when it concluded an agreement, which has been described by some as a “treaty,” with a large community of Aboriginal people in the south west of the state. This agreement, referred to as the Noongar Settlement, has the potential to serve as a model not only for other parts of Australia, but also beyond the shores of Australia. It recognises the traditional ownership of the land of the Noongar people, but then it goes on to establish for the Noongar people self-governing corporations. The corporations are not public law institutions, but in effect the powers and functions they discharge are of such a nature that they form in effect a fourth level of government. The corporations can exercise powers and functions not only in regard to aspects arising from traditional law and customs, but also in socio-economic fields such as housing, welfare, land management, conservation and tourism. The Noongar Settlement places Australia in a leading position when it comes to the holistic settlement of a land claim and the recognition of Aboriginal people.","PeriodicalId":187232,"journal":{"name":"Indigenous, Aboriginal, Fugitive and Ethnic Groups Around the Globe","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indigenous, Aboriginal, Fugitive and Ethnic Groups Around the Globe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Aboriginal people of Australia have for many year sought rectification of past injustices. The absence of political structures whereby Aboriginal people can communicate their views; govern themselves in regard to their traditions and culture; and promote their interests in similar way as applies to other indigenous people in the world has been identified as a major shortcoming in the institutional arrangements in Australia. It is especially since 1992 when native title had first been recognised in Australia that Aboriginal people have attempted to utilise their land rights as a basis for a form of self-government or autonomy. The shortcoming of this approach is, however, that native title only exists in certain areas; native title is a relative weak right; and native title does not entail any self-governance rights. Recently the federal state of Western Australia broke new ground when it concluded an agreement, which has been described by some as a “treaty,” with a large community of Aboriginal people in the south west of the state. This agreement, referred to as the Noongar Settlement, has the potential to serve as a model not only for other parts of Australia, but also beyond the shores of Australia. It recognises the traditional ownership of the land of the Noongar people, but then it goes on to establish for the Noongar people self-governing corporations. The corporations are not public law institutions, but in effect the powers and functions they discharge are of such a nature that they form in effect a fourth level of government. The corporations can exercise powers and functions not only in regard to aspects arising from traditional law and customs, but also in socio-economic fields such as housing, welfare, land management, conservation and tourism. The Noongar Settlement places Australia in a leading position when it comes to the holistic settlement of a land claim and the recognition of Aboriginal people.
澳大利亚Noongar人的私有化自治:土著自治的新模式
澳大利亚土著人民多年来一直寻求纠正过去的不公正。缺乏土著居民交流意见的政治结构;管理自己的传统和文化;并以适用于世界上其他土著人民的同样方式促进他们的利益已被确定为澳大利亚体制安排中的一个主要缺点。特别是自1992年澳大利亚首次承认土著所有权以来,土著人民试图利用他们的土地权作为一种自治或自治形式的基础。然而,这种方法的缺点是,本地所有权只存在于某些地区;土地权是一项相对薄弱的权利;原住民的头衔并不包含任何自治权利。最近,联邦州西澳大利亚州(Western Australia)与该州西南部的一大原住民社区达成了一项协议,开创了新的局面,一些人称之为“条约”。这项协议被称为努格尔和解协议,它不仅有可能成为澳大利亚其他地区的典范,而且也有可能成为澳大利亚以外地区的典范。它承认努格尔人对土地的传统所有权,但随后又为努格尔人建立了自治公司。公司不是公法机构,但实际上,它们所行使的权力和职能具有这样一种性质,即它们实际上构成了第四级政府。公司不仅可以在传统法律和习俗方面行使权力和职能,而且还可以在住房、福利、土地管理、养护和旅游等社会经济领域行使权力和职能。当涉及到土地要求的整体解决和对土著人民的承认时,Noongar定居点使澳大利亚处于领先地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信