Eudaimonism: Juxtaposition to the Concept of the Last Judgment on Matthew 25:31-46

A. Hendriks, Stimson Hutagalung, Jemmy C. Najoan
{"title":"Eudaimonism: Juxtaposition to the Concept of the Last Judgment on Matthew 25:31-46","authors":"A. Hendriks, Stimson Hutagalung, Jemmy C. Najoan","doi":"10.25278/jj.v20i2.661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of “ last judgment ” means punishment for the wicked and reward for the righteous with the ultimate goal of human life. Philosophers ’ theories sometimes contradict the contents of the Bible. Does eudaimonism go against the Bible or support each other? This study endeavours to cultivate a deeper insight into Aristotle ’ s happiness theory-eudaimonia juxtaposed with the pericope in Matthew about the final judgment. With a literature review approach, this qualitative method interpreted the narrative through several stages. Eudaimonia walks in rhythm with the concept of the final judgment in Matthew 25:31 – 46. Eudaimonia is about doing virtue as a self-maximizing potential to achieve the ultimate goal of human life, which is judged by reason as a demand of someone ’ s current situation with the assumption that leads to the truth. Matthew 25:31-46 reveals that the determination of “ last judgment ” is judged through practical religion by sharing Jesus ’ friendship “ today ” through virtue with those who hunger and thirst for truth. Those who do it will receive the kingdom of God, and those who do not will be thrown into eternal fire.","PeriodicalId":186227,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Jaffray","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Jaffray","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25278/jj.v20i2.661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of “ last judgment ” means punishment for the wicked and reward for the righteous with the ultimate goal of human life. Philosophers ’ theories sometimes contradict the contents of the Bible. Does eudaimonism go against the Bible or support each other? This study endeavours to cultivate a deeper insight into Aristotle ’ s happiness theory-eudaimonia juxtaposed with the pericope in Matthew about the final judgment. With a literature review approach, this qualitative method interpreted the narrative through several stages. Eudaimonia walks in rhythm with the concept of the final judgment in Matthew 25:31 – 46. Eudaimonia is about doing virtue as a self-maximizing potential to achieve the ultimate goal of human life, which is judged by reason as a demand of someone ’ s current situation with the assumption that leads to the truth. Matthew 25:31-46 reveals that the determination of “ last judgment ” is judged through practical religion by sharing Jesus ’ friendship “ today ” through virtue with those who hunger and thirst for truth. Those who do it will receive the kingdom of God, and those who do not will be thrown into eternal fire.
幸福论:与马太福音25:31-46最后审判概念的并列
“最后审判”的概念是指对恶人的惩罚和对义人的奖赏,以人类生命的最终目标。哲学家的理论有时与圣经的内容相矛盾。幸福论是与圣经相违背还是相互支持?本研究试图对亚里士多德的幸福理论——与《马太福音》中关于最后审判的伯里考普并列的快乐论——进行更深入的探讨。这种定性方法采用文献回顾的方法,通过几个阶段来解释叙事。在马太福音25:31 - 46中,尤达摩尼亚与最后审判的概念步调一致。享乐主义是将美德作为一种自我最大化的潜能来实现人类生活的最终目标,这是由理性判断的,作为一种对某人当前处境的要求,并假设它会导致真相。马太福音25:31-46揭示了“最后审判”的决定是通过实际的宗教来判断的,通过美德与那些渴望真理的人分享耶稣“今天”的友谊。遵行这旨意的人,必得神的国。不遵行的人,要扔在永火里。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信