Choosing the Best-fit Lifecycle Framework while Addressing Functionality and Security Issues

Salman M. Faizi, Shawon S. M. Rahman
{"title":"Choosing the Best-fit Lifecycle Framework while Addressing Functionality and Security Issues","authors":"Salman M. Faizi, Shawon S. M. Rahman","doi":"10.29007/CFM3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software application development must include implementation of core functionality along with secure coding to contain security vulnerabilities of applications. Considering the life cycle that a software application undergoes, application developers have many opportunities to include security starting from the very first stage of planning or requirement gathering. However, before even starting requirement gathering, the software application development team must select a framework to use for the application’s lifecycle. Based on the application and organizational characteristics, software application developers must select the best-fit framework for the lifecycle. A software application’s functionality and security start with picking the right lifecycle framework. When it comes to application development frameworks, one size does not fit all. Based on the characteristics of the application development organization such as the number of application developers involved, project budget and criticality, and the number of teams, one of the five frameworks will work better than others.","PeriodicalId":264035,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Computers and Their Applications","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Computers and Their Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29007/CFM3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Software application development must include implementation of core functionality along with secure coding to contain security vulnerabilities of applications. Considering the life cycle that a software application undergoes, application developers have many opportunities to include security starting from the very first stage of planning or requirement gathering. However, before even starting requirement gathering, the software application development team must select a framework to use for the application’s lifecycle. Based on the application and organizational characteristics, software application developers must select the best-fit framework for the lifecycle. A software application’s functionality and security start with picking the right lifecycle framework. When it comes to application development frameworks, one size does not fit all. Based on the characteristics of the application development organization such as the number of application developers involved, project budget and criticality, and the number of teams, one of the five frameworks will work better than others.
选择最合适的生命周期框架,同时解决功能和安全问题
软件应用程序开发必须包括核心功能的实现以及包含应用程序安全漏洞的安全编码。考虑到软件应用程序所经历的生命周期,应用程序开发人员有很多机会从计划或需求收集的第一个阶段开始就包括安全性。然而,在开始需求收集之前,软件应用程序开发团队必须为应用程序的生命周期选择一个框架。基于应用程序和组织特征,软件应用程序开发人员必须为生命周期选择最合适的框架。软件应用程序的功能和安全性首先要选择正确的生命周期框架。当涉及到应用程序开发框架时,一种规格并不适合所有的应用程序。基于应用程序开发组织的特征,例如所涉及的应用程序开发人员的数量、项目预算和重要性以及团队的数量,五个框架中的一个将比其他框架更好地工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信