Harmeet Bhullar, L. Shukla, R. Shayan, F. Bruscino‐Raiola
{"title":"Enhanced risk of multiple sentinel lymph node basins in truncal and head and neck melanoma","authors":"Harmeet Bhullar, L. Shukla, R. Shayan, F. Bruscino‐Raiola","doi":"10.34239/ajops.v5n1.267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Truncal and head and neck melanomas have a greater propensity to drain to multiple lymph node basins (MLNB) compared to extremity melanomas, which drain predominantly to a single lymph node basin (SLNB). The objective of this study was to compare the lymphatic drainage patterns and characteristics of truncal and head and neck melanoma, to assess their clinical usefulness in areas of unpredictable drainage. \nMethods: A retrospective review of 143 patients with head and neck or truncal melanoma from 2014–2018 treated at a tertiary referral hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Patients scheduled for a wide local excision (WLE) and SeNBx, and those whose initial biopsy results stated melanoma type, cell type and BT, were included. Patients were excluded if they underwent nodal biopsy alone.\nResults: We identified 95 patients with truncal and 48 with head and neck melanoma. Drainage to MLNB was significantly higher in the truncal melanoma group (36.8%) compared to the head and neck group (10.4%) (P = 0.001). Patients with drainage to MLNB had a higher positive sentinel node biopsy (SeNBx) rate compared to those with SLNB (40.0% verus. 12.6%, P <0.0001). Truncal melanomas that drained to MLNB were associated with a significantly higher Breslow thickness (2.1 versus. 1.5, P = 0.02), ulceration (40.6% vs. 20.7%, P = 0.043) and mitotic rate (3.0 versus. 2.0, P = 0.045) compared to equivalent melanomas that drained to SLNB. \nConclusion: Patients with melanomas occurring in the trunk exhibit higher rates of drainage to MLNB compared to melanomas arising in the head and neck. Patients with drainage to MLNB also demonstrate a higher rate of positive SeNBx than those with SLNB drainage. This may represent more aggressive disease pathology or later diagnosis of lesions within these locations, or a lymphatic system that is more facilitatory of spread.","PeriodicalId":264055,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"213 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v5n1.267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Truncal and head and neck melanomas have a greater propensity to drain to multiple lymph node basins (MLNB) compared to extremity melanomas, which drain predominantly to a single lymph node basin (SLNB). The objective of this study was to compare the lymphatic drainage patterns and characteristics of truncal and head and neck melanoma, to assess their clinical usefulness in areas of unpredictable drainage.
Methods: A retrospective review of 143 patients with head and neck or truncal melanoma from 2014–2018 treated at a tertiary referral hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Patients scheduled for a wide local excision (WLE) and SeNBx, and those whose initial biopsy results stated melanoma type, cell type and BT, were included. Patients were excluded if they underwent nodal biopsy alone.
Results: We identified 95 patients with truncal and 48 with head and neck melanoma. Drainage to MLNB was significantly higher in the truncal melanoma group (36.8%) compared to the head and neck group (10.4%) (P = 0.001). Patients with drainage to MLNB had a higher positive sentinel node biopsy (SeNBx) rate compared to those with SLNB (40.0% verus. 12.6%, P <0.0001). Truncal melanomas that drained to MLNB were associated with a significantly higher Breslow thickness (2.1 versus. 1.5, P = 0.02), ulceration (40.6% vs. 20.7%, P = 0.043) and mitotic rate (3.0 versus. 2.0, P = 0.045) compared to equivalent melanomas that drained to SLNB.
Conclusion: Patients with melanomas occurring in the trunk exhibit higher rates of drainage to MLNB compared to melanomas arising in the head and neck. Patients with drainage to MLNB also demonstrate a higher rate of positive SeNBx than those with SLNB drainage. This may represent more aggressive disease pathology or later diagnosis of lesions within these locations, or a lymphatic system that is more facilitatory of spread.
前言:与四肢黑色素瘤相比,躯干和头颈部黑色素瘤更倾向于流向多个淋巴结池(MLNB),而四肢黑色素瘤主要流向单个淋巴结池(SLNB)。本研究的目的是比较躯干和头颈部黑色素瘤的淋巴引流模式和特征,以评估其在不可预测引流区域的临床应用价值。方法:回顾性分析2014-2018年在澳大利亚墨尔本一家三级转诊医院治疗的143例头颈部或躯干黑色素瘤患者。计划进行大面积局部切除(WLE)和SeNBx的患者,以及那些最初活检结果表明黑色素瘤类型、细胞类型和BT的患者,都被包括在内。仅行淋巴结活检者排除。结果:我们确定了95例躯干黑色素瘤和48例头颈部黑色素瘤。躯干黑色素瘤组(36.8%)的MLNB引流率明显高于头颈部组(10.4%)(P = 0.001)。与SLNB患者相比,MLNB引流患者前哨淋巴结活检阳性(SeNBx)率更高(40.0%)。12.6%, p <0.0001)。引流至MLNB的截骨黑色素瘤与显著较高的Breslow厚度相关(2.1 vs . 2)。1.5, P = 0.02),溃疡(40.6%比20.7%,P = 0.043)和有丝分裂率(3.0比。2.0, P = 0.045),与引流到SLNB的等效黑色素瘤相比。结论:与头颈部黑色素瘤相比,发生在躯干的黑色素瘤患者的MLNB引流率更高。MLNB引流的患者SeNBx阳性率也高于SLNB引流的患者。这可能代表更具侵袭性的疾病病理或在这些部位的病变诊断较晚,或者淋巴系统更容易扩散。