“Strochki” and “fitki”, “rosvodets” and “roznamenka”. Special features of theoretical texts in the manuscript from the Russian State Library mus. № 875

Z. Guseinova
{"title":"“Strochki” and “fitki”, “rosvodets” and “roznamenka”. Special features of theoretical texts in the manuscript from the Russian State Library mus. № 875","authors":"Z. Guseinova","doi":"10.15382/sturv202350.24-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The musical and theoretical manuals of the 17th century contain extensive information about the znamenny chant and the processes of change that took place in it over the course of a century. Created in many russian scriptoriums they reflected the local features of church singing and the features of its theoretical comprehension, expressed, in particular, in the formation of specific terminology. The manuscript of the Museum Collection of the Russian State Library (fund 178) No. 875, which conventionally dates back to 1605-1610, includes an extensive theoretical codex, which presents in general traditional theoretical manuals, but in a special design and with the use of unusual terminological forms. The codex includes two major manuals – “Grani” and “Fito-kokiznik”, each of which covers different types of documents. The predominant ones in them are kokizniks and fitnics, which are sequentially copied the various independent manuals, demonstrating formulas with and without divorces, containing material from various singing books (Oktoich, Stichirar’ Minayny, etc.) and genres (tropari, blazhenny etc.), organized by eight modes. The author of the codex does not intend to bring together the information of different manuals, he prefers to save each document in its original form. But at the same time, to denote theoretical positions, the author uses diminutive and affectionate suffixes that give traditional terms a special, soft shade: \"strochka\" instead of \"stroka\", \"fitka\" instead of \"fita\", \"rosvodetc\" instead of \"rosvod\", etc. It is also unusual to use literary terminology to denote special textual and musical lines, in particular, \"dinfong\" (diphthong). A remarkable feature of the codex is also the presence of special chants with the corresponding remarks \"Troitsky\", as well as the introduction of a fita divorce of the monk Isaiah (presumably Ivan Lukoshkov).","PeriodicalId":212447,"journal":{"name":"St. Tikhons' University Review. Series V. Christian Art","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"St. Tikhons' University Review. Series V. Christian Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturv202350.24-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The musical and theoretical manuals of the 17th century contain extensive information about the znamenny chant and the processes of change that took place in it over the course of a century. Created in many russian scriptoriums they reflected the local features of church singing and the features of its theoretical comprehension, expressed, in particular, in the formation of specific terminology. The manuscript of the Museum Collection of the Russian State Library (fund 178) No. 875, which conventionally dates back to 1605-1610, includes an extensive theoretical codex, which presents in general traditional theoretical manuals, but in a special design and with the use of unusual terminological forms. The codex includes two major manuals – “Grani” and “Fito-kokiznik”, each of which covers different types of documents. The predominant ones in them are kokizniks and fitnics, which are sequentially copied the various independent manuals, demonstrating formulas with and without divorces, containing material from various singing books (Oktoich, Stichirar’ Minayny, etc.) and genres (tropari, blazhenny etc.), organized by eight modes. The author of the codex does not intend to bring together the information of different manuals, he prefers to save each document in its original form. But at the same time, to denote theoretical positions, the author uses diminutive and affectionate suffixes that give traditional terms a special, soft shade: "strochka" instead of "stroka", "fitka" instead of "fita", "rosvodetc" instead of "rosvod", etc. It is also unusual to use literary terminology to denote special textual and musical lines, in particular, "dinfong" (diphthong). A remarkable feature of the codex is also the presence of special chants with the corresponding remarks "Troitsky", as well as the introduction of a fita divorce of the monk Isaiah (presumably Ivan Lukoshkov).
“Strochki”和“fitki”,“rosvodets”和“roznamenka”。俄罗斯图书馆手稿的特别特征。№875
17世纪的音乐和理论手册包含了大量关于赞美诗的信息,以及一个世纪以来它所发生的变化过程。在许多俄罗斯的缮写室中创作,它们反映了教会歌唱的地方特征及其理论理解的特征,特别是在特定术语的形成中表达出来。俄罗斯国家图书馆博物馆收藏(178基金)第875号的手稿,通常可以追溯到1605-1610年,包括一个广泛的理论法典,它在一般的传统理论手册中呈现,但在一个特殊的设计和使用不寻常的术语形式。该法典包括两个主要手册-“Grani”和“Fito-kokiznik”,每个手册涵盖不同类型的文件。其中最主要的是kokizniks和fitnics,它们依次复制了各种独立的手册,演示了有和没有离婚的公式,包含了各种歌唱书籍(Oktoich, Stichirar ' Minayny等)和流派(tropari, blazhenny等)的材料,按八种调式组织。本法典的作者并不打算将不同手册的信息汇集在一起,他更愿意以原始形式保存每一份文件。但与此同时,为了表示理论立场,作者使用了小而亲切的后缀,使传统术语具有特殊而柔和的色调:用“strochka”代替“stroka”,用“fitka”代替“fita”,用“rosvodetc”代替“rosvod”等等。用文学术语来表示特殊的文本和音乐线条也是不寻常的,特别是“定调”(双元音)。手抄本的一个显著特征是有特殊的圣歌和相应的“Troitsky”的注释,以及僧侣以赛亚(可能是Ivan Lukoshkov)离婚的介绍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信