Comparison of Unit-Cell and All-Cells Active Element Patterns of Small Antenna Array

N. A. Malek, Khaleef Khairul Anuar, O. Khalifa, M. R. Islam
{"title":"Comparison of Unit-Cell and All-Cells Active Element Patterns of Small Antenna Array","authors":"N. A. Malek, Khaleef Khairul Anuar, O. Khalifa, M. R. Islam","doi":"10.1109/RFM50841.2020.9344754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, an array of microstrip patch array antenna has been designed and simulated for 5G applications at 28 GHz. Beamforming which requires pattern analysis remain significant especially for 5G communication as it is able to mitigate high path loss at high frequency. Thus, an accurate pattern analysis is essential in order to obtain accurate beamforming capability. Active element pattern is one of the techniques, considering better accuracy as it includes mutual coupling effect between elements in antenna array. In many cases, unit-cell AEP was preferable because full element-by-element analysis was time consuming and complex especially for infinite or large antenna arrays. However, this analysis is less accurate for small antenna arrays due to different neighboring elements between centre-fed and edge-fed elements which makes all-cells AEP is more accurate rather than unit-cell AEP. This paper compares between unit-cell (UC) and all-cells (AC) of active element patterns (AEPs) in 1 by 4 patch antenna array. The geometrical design of the microstrip patch array antenna is simulated and executed using CST Microwave Studio (CST MWS). Both (AEPs) are obtained from simulation for pattern synthesis in beamforming. The results show that AC-AEP performs better for pattern synthesis compared to UC-AEP. Thus, AC-AEP is recommended for pattern synthesis of small antenna arrays rather than UC-AEP.","PeriodicalId":138339,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International RF and Microwave Conference (RFM)","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International RF and Microwave Conference (RFM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RFM50841.2020.9344754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, an array of microstrip patch array antenna has been designed and simulated for 5G applications at 28 GHz. Beamforming which requires pattern analysis remain significant especially for 5G communication as it is able to mitigate high path loss at high frequency. Thus, an accurate pattern analysis is essential in order to obtain accurate beamforming capability. Active element pattern is one of the techniques, considering better accuracy as it includes mutual coupling effect between elements in antenna array. In many cases, unit-cell AEP was preferable because full element-by-element analysis was time consuming and complex especially for infinite or large antenna arrays. However, this analysis is less accurate for small antenna arrays due to different neighboring elements between centre-fed and edge-fed elements which makes all-cells AEP is more accurate rather than unit-cell AEP. This paper compares between unit-cell (UC) and all-cells (AC) of active element patterns (AEPs) in 1 by 4 patch antenna array. The geometrical design of the microstrip patch array antenna is simulated and executed using CST Microwave Studio (CST MWS). Both (AEPs) are obtained from simulation for pattern synthesis in beamforming. The results show that AC-AEP performs better for pattern synthesis compared to UC-AEP. Thus, AC-AEP is recommended for pattern synthesis of small antenna arrays rather than UC-AEP.
小型天线阵单小区与全小区有源元图的比较
本文设计并仿真了一种用于5G 28ghz应用的微带贴片阵列天线阵列。需要模式分析的波束形成仍然很重要,特别是对于5G通信,因为它能够减轻高频下的高路径损耗。因此,为了获得精确的波束形成能力,精确的方向图分析是必不可少的。有源单元方向图是其中一种技术,由于考虑了天线阵中各单元之间的相互耦合效应,具有较好的精度。在许多情况下,单元AEP更可取,因为完整的逐单元分析耗时且复杂,特别是对于无限或大型天线阵列。然而,由于中心馈电单元和边缘馈电单元之间的相邻单元不同,这种分析对小型天线阵列的精度较低,这使得全小区AEP比单位小区AEP更准确。本文比较了1 × 4贴片天线阵中有源单元图(AEPs)的单单元图(UC)和全单元图(AC)。利用CST Microwave Studio (CST MWS)对微带贴片阵列天线的几何设计进行了仿真和执行。通过对波束形成过程中方向图合成的仿真得到了两种AEPs。结果表明,与UC-AEP相比,AC-AEP具有更好的模式合成性能。因此,建议将AC-AEP用于小型天线阵列的方向图合成,而不是UC-AEP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信