Statistics in face recognition: analyzing probability distributions of PCA, ICA and LDA performance results

K. Delac, M. Grgic, S. Grgic
{"title":"Statistics in face recognition: analyzing probability distributions of PCA, ICA and LDA performance results","authors":"K. Delac, M. Grgic, S. Grgic","doi":"10.1109/ISPA.2005.195425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we address the issue of evaluating face recognition algorithms using descriptive statistical tools. By using permutation methodology in a Monte Carlo sampling procedure, we investigate recognition rate results probability distributions of some well-known algorithms (namely, PCA, ICA and LDA). With a lot of contradictory literature on comparisons of those algorithms, we believe that this kind of independent study is important and serves to better understanding of each algorithm. We show how simplistic approach to comparing these algorithms can be misleading and propose a full statistical methodology to be used in future reports. By reporting detailed descriptive statistical results, this paper is the only available detailed report on PCA, ICA and LDA comparative performance currently available in literature. Our experiments show that the exact choice of images to be in a gallery or in a probe set has great effect on recognition results and this fact further emphasizes the importance of reporting detailed results. We hope that this study helps to advance the state of experiment design in computer vision.","PeriodicalId":238993,"journal":{"name":"ISPA 2005. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis, 2005.","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPA 2005. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPA.2005.195425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

In this paper we address the issue of evaluating face recognition algorithms using descriptive statistical tools. By using permutation methodology in a Monte Carlo sampling procedure, we investigate recognition rate results probability distributions of some well-known algorithms (namely, PCA, ICA and LDA). With a lot of contradictory literature on comparisons of those algorithms, we believe that this kind of independent study is important and serves to better understanding of each algorithm. We show how simplistic approach to comparing these algorithms can be misleading and propose a full statistical methodology to be used in future reports. By reporting detailed descriptive statistical results, this paper is the only available detailed report on PCA, ICA and LDA comparative performance currently available in literature. Our experiments show that the exact choice of images to be in a gallery or in a probe set has great effect on recognition results and this fact further emphasizes the importance of reporting detailed results. We hope that this study helps to advance the state of experiment design in computer vision.
人脸识别中的统计学:分析PCA、ICA和LDA性能结果的概率分布
在本文中,我们解决了使用描述性统计工具评估人脸识别算法的问题。通过在蒙特卡罗采样过程中使用排列方法,我们研究了一些知名算法(即PCA, ICA和LDA)的识别率结果概率分布。由于对这些算法的比较有很多相互矛盾的文献,我们认为这种独立研究很重要,有助于更好地理解每种算法。我们展示了比较这些算法的简单方法可能会产生误导,并提出了一个完整的统计方法,以在未来的报告中使用。通过报告详细的描述性统计结果,本文是目前文献中唯一一篇关于PCA、ICA和LDA比较性能的详细报告。我们的实验表明,在图库或探针集中准确选择图像对识别结果有很大影响,这一事实进一步强调了报告详细结果的重要性。希望本研究能对计算机视觉实验设计的发展起到一定的推动作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信