Sistem Kendali Eddy Current Brakes Dinamometer menggunakan Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR)

M. Arrofiq, Lukman Sidiq Nugroho, Fahmizal Fahmizal, E. Apriaskar
{"title":"Sistem Kendali Eddy Current Brakes Dinamometer menggunakan Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR)","authors":"M. Arrofiq, Lukman Sidiq Nugroho, Fahmizal Fahmizal, E. Apriaskar","doi":"10.26760/elkomika.v9i4.923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRAKMakalah ini memberikan analisis perbandingan antara teknik kendali klasik yaitu kendali PID dengan teknik kendali modern pada sistem Eddy current brakes dinamometer. Eddy current brakes merupakan sistem pengereman modern yang membutuhkan sebuah sistem kendali untuk menunjang kinerja pengereman. Selama ini kendali PID lebih sering digunakan, namun di beberapa kondisi dinilai kurang optimal. Dengan demikian, diperlukan pengembangan kendali yang modern dan optimal yaitu full state feedback Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR). Perbandingan respon waktu pengereman disimulasikan menggunakan Matlab/Simulink. Hasil simulasi menunjukkan respon waktu pengereman pada kendali LQR lebih baik dibandingkan dengan kendali PID, dengan Ts = 2.12 detik, Tr = 1.18 detik, dan tanpa overshoot. Adapun kendali PID, meskipun menghasilkan Ts = 0.27 detik dan Tr = 0.18 detik, namun demikian masih terdapat overshoot sebesar 0.7%.Kata kunci: Eddy brakes, PID, LQR, Matlab ABSTRACTThis paper provides a comparative analysis between PID control as a classical control technique and modern control technique in the dinamometer Eddy current brakes system. Eddy current brakes is a modern braking system that requires a control system to support the braking performance. PID control is often used to be implemented but in some conditions it is less optimal. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a modern and optimal control, such as a full state feedback Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR). The comparison of the braking time responses were simulated using Matlab/Simulink. The simulation results show that the response of LQR control is better than the PID, with Ts = 2.12 seconds, Tr = 1.18 seconds, and without overshoot. On the other side, PID control, although having Ts = 0.27 seconds and Tr = 0.18 seconds, there is still an overshoot about 0.7%.Keywords: Eddy brakes, PID, LQR, Matlab","PeriodicalId":344430,"journal":{"name":"ELKOMIKA: Jurnal Teknik Energi Elektrik, Teknik Telekomunikasi, & Teknik Elektronika","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELKOMIKA: Jurnal Teknik Energi Elektrik, Teknik Telekomunikasi, & Teknik Elektronika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26760/elkomika.v9i4.923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRAKMakalah ini memberikan analisis perbandingan antara teknik kendali klasik yaitu kendali PID dengan teknik kendali modern pada sistem Eddy current brakes dinamometer. Eddy current brakes merupakan sistem pengereman modern yang membutuhkan sebuah sistem kendali untuk menunjang kinerja pengereman. Selama ini kendali PID lebih sering digunakan, namun di beberapa kondisi dinilai kurang optimal. Dengan demikian, diperlukan pengembangan kendali yang modern dan optimal yaitu full state feedback Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR). Perbandingan respon waktu pengereman disimulasikan menggunakan Matlab/Simulink. Hasil simulasi menunjukkan respon waktu pengereman pada kendali LQR lebih baik dibandingkan dengan kendali PID, dengan Ts = 2.12 detik, Tr = 1.18 detik, dan tanpa overshoot. Adapun kendali PID, meskipun menghasilkan Ts = 0.27 detik dan Tr = 0.18 detik, namun demikian masih terdapat overshoot sebesar 0.7%.Kata kunci: Eddy brakes, PID, LQR, Matlab ABSTRACTThis paper provides a comparative analysis between PID control as a classical control technique and modern control technique in the dinamometer Eddy current brakes system. Eddy current brakes is a modern braking system that requires a control system to support the braking performance. PID control is often used to be implemented but in some conditions it is less optimal. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a modern and optimal control, such as a full state feedback Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR). The comparison of the braking time responses were simulated using Matlab/Simulink. The simulation results show that the response of LQR control is better than the PID, with Ts = 2.12 seconds, Tr = 1.18 seconds, and without overshoot. On the other side, PID control, although having Ts = 0.27 seconds and Tr = 0.18 seconds, there is still an overshoot about 0.7%.Keywords: Eddy brakes, PID, LQR, Matlab
系统Kendali涡流制动器扭矩计menggunakan线性二次调节器(LQR)
本文提供了一种比较经典的PID式控制技术和当代涡流制动动力系统控制技术之间的比较。涡流制动器是一种现代刹车系统,需要一个控制系统来支持刹车性能。长期以来,PID控制得到了更多的利用,但在某些情况下被认为是不太理想的。因此,我们需要一种最现代化、最优控制——全态反馈线性Quadratic调节器(LQR)。使用Matlab/Simulink模拟模拟模拟模拟模拟模拟时制动时间响应率的比较。模拟结果显示,LQR控制制动时间反应比PID控制好,Ts = 2.12秒,Tr = 1.18秒,没有超导。至于PID控制,尽管Ts = 0.27秒和Tr = 0.18秒,但仍然有0.7%的优势。关键词:Eddy brakes, PID, LQR, Matlab ABSTRACTThis paper provides涡流刹车是一种现代刹车系统,要求控制系统来支持刹车表演。PID控制经常被用于执行,但在某些情况下它是不理想的。因此,有必要培养一种现代和最佳的控制系统,这样就像一个全面的线性四轴调节器(LQR)。拦截时间响应系统使用Matlab/Simulink模拟模拟。模拟结果显示,LQR控制的反应比PID的反应好,Ts = 2.12秒,Tr = 1.18秒,而且没有超射。另一方面,PID控制,尽管有0.27秒和Tr = 0.18秒,但仍有0.7%的差距。艾迪·布雷,PID, LQR, Matlab
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信