MAKNA KEPENTINGAN UMUM DIDALAM DEPONERING

Windi Jannati M.A.S, F. Simangunsong
{"title":"MAKNA KEPENTINGAN UMUM DIDALAM DEPONERING","authors":"Windi Jannati M.A.S, F. Simangunsong","doi":"10.53363/bureau.v2i2.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Law No. 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office, there is a definition or understanding of Deponering namely the public interest, the interest in question is the interest of the state, nation and other community interests as stated in Article 35 (c). This deponering is an implementation of the opportunity principle owned by the prosecutor which has its own purpose, namely adjudicating cases, but the regulations or rules are still unclear, resulting in a blurring of norms because there are no special limits regarding the meaning of the public interest. carried out by the prosecutor and there was a misinterpretation in the determination of deponering. The proposed formulation is as follows 1. What is the meaning of the phrase public interest in deponering based on Article 35 (c) of Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. 2. What are the criteria for public interest as a condition for deponering to realize justice in law enforcement. The research method used is a normative research method using 2 approaches: a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study are the meaning of the phrase in question, prioritizing common interests rather than personal interests, and in its application the attorney general must obtain consideration from the state power agency that is related to the problem and the criteria in realizing justice for law enforcement, so in making decisions to using this deponering, the prosecutor must coordinate with the Supreme Court, the constitutional court the DPR, the President","PeriodicalId":345865,"journal":{"name":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i2.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Law No. 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office, there is a definition or understanding of Deponering namely the public interest, the interest in question is the interest of the state, nation and other community interests as stated in Article 35 (c). This deponering is an implementation of the opportunity principle owned by the prosecutor which has its own purpose, namely adjudicating cases, but the regulations or rules are still unclear, resulting in a blurring of norms because there are no special limits regarding the meaning of the public interest. carried out by the prosecutor and there was a misinterpretation in the determination of deponering. The proposed formulation is as follows 1. What is the meaning of the phrase public interest in deponering based on Article 35 (c) of Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. 2. What are the criteria for public interest as a condition for deponering to realize justice in law enforcement. The research method used is a normative research method using 2 approaches: a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study are the meaning of the phrase in question, prioritizing common interests rather than personal interests, and in its application the attorney general must obtain consideration from the state power agency that is related to the problem and the criteria in realizing justice for law enforcement, so in making decisions to using this deponering, the prosecutor must coordinate with the Supreme Court, the constitutional court the DPR, the President
共同的兴趣在颠覆性
在2004年第16号关于检察官办公室的法律中,对撤诉有一个定义或理解,即公共利益,所涉及的利益是第35 (c)条所述的国家、民族和其他社会利益的利益。这种撤诉是对检察官拥有的机会原则的实施,它有自己的目的,即审判案件,但条例或规则尚不明确。由于公共利益的含义没有特别的限制,导致了规范的模糊。是由检察官进行的,在判定是否撤诉时存在误解。建议的提法如下:1。根据2004年关于印度尼西亚共和国总检察长办公室的第16号法律第35条(c)款,“撤诉中的公共利益”一词的含义是什么?公共利益作为执法中实现正义的条件的标准是什么?使用的研究方法是规范性研究方法,使用两种方法:法定方法和概念方法。本研究的结果是该短语的含义,优先考虑共同利益而不是个人利益,并且在其应用中,司法部长必须获得与问题相关的国家权力机构和执法实现正义的标准的考虑,因此在决定使用该短语时,检察官必须与最高法院,宪法法院,人民代表大会,总统进行协调
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信