Modeling and Verification for Different Types of System of Systems using PRISM

Dong-Geun Seo, Donghwan Shin, Young-Min Baek, Jiyoung Song, Wonkyung Yun, Junho Kim, Eunkyoung Jee, Doo-Hwan Bae
{"title":"Modeling and Verification for Different Types of System of Systems using PRISM","authors":"Dong-Geun Seo, Donghwan Shin, Young-Min Baek, Jiyoung Song, Wonkyung Yun, Junho Kim, Eunkyoung Jee, Doo-Hwan Bae","doi":"10.1145/2897829.2897833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A System of Systems (SoS) consists of complex Constituent Systems (CSs), which have managerial and operational independence. As the CSs have independence, the degree of authority to control the CSs varies depending on the different types of SoS, such as directed, acknowledged, and collaborative SoS. While many researchers have attempted to model SoSs and verify SoS-level goals, little attention has been paid to how different types of SoSs are characterized and realized during modeling and verification. Using a mass casualty incident response system as a common working example for different types of a SoS, we model the types of SoS with probabilistic models of PRISM, which can capture uncertain behaviors of an SoS in a quantitative manner and perform statistical model checking in order to verify to which extent each type of SoS achieves the SoS-level goal. Differences between the different types of SoS are demonstrated in the probabilistic models and analyzed by statistical model checking. This modeling and verification can help SoS-level managers to identify the appropriate SoS types to achieve the SoS-level goal.","PeriodicalId":103741,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems (SESoS)","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems (SESoS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2897829.2897833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

A System of Systems (SoS) consists of complex Constituent Systems (CSs), which have managerial and operational independence. As the CSs have independence, the degree of authority to control the CSs varies depending on the different types of SoS, such as directed, acknowledged, and collaborative SoS. While many researchers have attempted to model SoSs and verify SoS-level goals, little attention has been paid to how different types of SoSs are characterized and realized during modeling and verification. Using a mass casualty incident response system as a common working example for different types of a SoS, we model the types of SoS with probabilistic models of PRISM, which can capture uncertain behaviors of an SoS in a quantitative manner and perform statistical model checking in order to verify to which extent each type of SoS achieves the SoS-level goal. Differences between the different types of SoS are demonstrated in the probabilistic models and analyzed by statistical model checking. This modeling and verification can help SoS-level managers to identify the appropriate SoS types to achieve the SoS-level goal.
基于PRISM的不同类型系统的建模与验证
系统的系统(so)由复杂的组成系统(CSs)组成,这些组成系统具有管理和操作独立性。由于CSs具有独立性,因此控制CSs的权限程度取决于不同类型的SoS,例如指令性,承认性和协作性SoS。虽然许多研究者试图对社会责任系统进行建模并验证社会责任级别目标,但很少有人关注在建模和验证过程中不同类型的社会责任系统是如何表征和实现的。以大规模伤亡事件响应系统为例,采用PRISM的概率模型对不同类型的SoS进行建模,该模型可以定量捕获SoS的不确定性行为,并进行统计模型检查,以验证每种类型的SoS在多大程度上实现了SoS级别的目标。在概率模型中展示了不同类型SoS之间的差异,并通过统计模型检验进行了分析。这种建模和验证可以帮助SoS级别的管理人员识别适当的SoS类型,以实现SoS级别的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信