Impact of Upscaling on Numerical Estimation of Polymer Increments

M. Bourgeois, J. Hild, R. Bursaux
{"title":"Impact of Upscaling on Numerical Estimation of Polymer Increments","authors":"M. Bourgeois, J. Hild, R. Bursaux","doi":"10.2118/195556-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Two upscaling exercises performed in 2013-14 and 2017-18 on two onshore green fields with conventional to viscous oil are presented, for which the upscaling tried to compensate the effects of grid coarsening, in particular the increase of numerical dispersion and the decrease of heterogeneity. Our methodology was to adjust the water/oil relative permeabilities called pseudo KRs in the coarse scale simulation, in order to reproduce the behavior in terms of pressure, rates, saturations and concentrations of the fine scale model, which was using microscopic rock KRs based on laboratory data.\n As the upscaling depends on the fluid injected, it was done separately for waterflood and polymer flood. When done with polymer flood, the concentration of polymer had to be history matched also mainly by adjusting the Todd-Longstaff mixing parameter in addition to the KRs. As upscaling is case dependent, it was performed on several geological models, varying heterogeneity and grid size, but also rock KRs and even precocity of the polymer flood after some waterflood, to test the robustness of the approach.\n It was found that pseudo-KRs for waterflood could be slightly degraded for viscous oils, whereas the upscaling was more neutral for conventional oils. This correlates well with field observation for viscous oils, where water production occurs generally a bit quicker than what numerical simulation predicts when using rock KRs, in absence of upscaling.\n For polymer floods, which were considered in secondary or early tertiary mode, pseudo KRs were generally improved, mainly because the polymer steepened the saturation fronts, which can be well represented only with small lateral grid size.\n The result of both upscaling exercises was that the increment of polymer flood versus waterflood was noticeably higher when computed on high resolution modelling. This is equivalent to saying that when using pseudo KRs resulting from this high resolution matching, the polymer increment on coarse grid is significantly higher than if computed without pseudo KRs. This improves the economic evaluation of the project, increasing the willingness to de-risk and implement early polymer floods on these fields.","PeriodicalId":103248,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, June 06, 2019","volume":"415 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, June 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195556-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Two upscaling exercises performed in 2013-14 and 2017-18 on two onshore green fields with conventional to viscous oil are presented, for which the upscaling tried to compensate the effects of grid coarsening, in particular the increase of numerical dispersion and the decrease of heterogeneity. Our methodology was to adjust the water/oil relative permeabilities called pseudo KRs in the coarse scale simulation, in order to reproduce the behavior in terms of pressure, rates, saturations and concentrations of the fine scale model, which was using microscopic rock KRs based on laboratory data. As the upscaling depends on the fluid injected, it was done separately for waterflood and polymer flood. When done with polymer flood, the concentration of polymer had to be history matched also mainly by adjusting the Todd-Longstaff mixing parameter in addition to the KRs. As upscaling is case dependent, it was performed on several geological models, varying heterogeneity and grid size, but also rock KRs and even precocity of the polymer flood after some waterflood, to test the robustness of the approach. It was found that pseudo-KRs for waterflood could be slightly degraded for viscous oils, whereas the upscaling was more neutral for conventional oils. This correlates well with field observation for viscous oils, where water production occurs generally a bit quicker than what numerical simulation predicts when using rock KRs, in absence of upscaling. For polymer floods, which were considered in secondary or early tertiary mode, pseudo KRs were generally improved, mainly because the polymer steepened the saturation fronts, which can be well represented only with small lateral grid size. The result of both upscaling exercises was that the increment of polymer flood versus waterflood was noticeably higher when computed on high resolution modelling. This is equivalent to saying that when using pseudo KRs resulting from this high resolution matching, the polymer increment on coarse grid is significantly higher than if computed without pseudo KRs. This improves the economic evaluation of the project, increasing the willingness to de-risk and implement early polymer floods on these fields.
升级对聚合物增量数值估计的影响
本文介绍了2013-14年和2017-18年在两个陆上常规至稠油绿色油田进行的两次升级演习,其中升级试图补偿网格粗化的影响,特别是数值离散度的增加和非均质性的降低。我们的方法是在粗尺度模拟中调整称为伪KRs的水/油相对渗透率,以便在基于实验室数据的微观岩石KRs的细尺度模型中再现压力、速率、饱和度和浓度方面的行为。由于升级取决于注入的流体,因此水驱和聚合物驱是分开进行的。在进行聚合物驱时,除了kr之外,还必须通过调整Todd-Longstaff混合参数来匹配聚合物的浓度。为了测试该方法的稳健性,研究人员在不同的地质模型上进行了扩展,包括不同的非均质性和网格大小,以及岩石KRs,甚至是注水后聚合物驱的早熟现象。研究发现,对于稠油来说,水驱的伪krs可以略微降解,而对于常规油来说,伪krs的提升是中性的。这与稠油的现场观测结果相吻合,在没有升级的情况下,稠油的产水速度通常比使用岩石KRs时的数值模拟预测要快一些。对于二级或早第三系模式的聚合物驱,伪KRs普遍得到改善,这主要是因为聚合物使饱和前缘变陡,只有较小的横向网格尺寸才能很好地表示饱和前缘。在高分辨率模型上计算时,两种升级练习的结果都是聚合物驱与水驱的增量明显更高。这相当于说,当使用这种高分辨率匹配产生的伪KRs时,粗网格上的聚合物增量明显高于不使用伪KRs计算时的聚合物增量。这提高了项目的经济评估,增加了降低风险和在这些油田早期实施聚合物驱的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信