The Question of the Real

M. Devès
{"title":"The Question of the Real","authors":"M. Devès","doi":"10.3917/rep.020.0107a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article draws upon the teachings of psychoanalysis in order to explore the place that “scientists” can, and cannot, hold in the face of the demands that are made of them. It explores the transference that is operative towards Science through figures of the monster and the Catastrophe. Since situations of catastrophe confront the individual and the collective with the question of the real, with the way this real is put into discourse and into a narrative, they allow us to underline the potentially traumatogenic character of the scientific project. This observation invites us to distinguish between the practice of research and the situation of the expert assessment.","PeriodicalId":351395,"journal":{"name":"Recherches en psychanalyse","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherches en psychanalyse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rep.020.0107a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article draws upon the teachings of psychoanalysis in order to explore the place that “scientists” can, and cannot, hold in the face of the demands that are made of them. It explores the transference that is operative towards Science through figures of the monster and the Catastrophe. Since situations of catastrophe confront the individual and the collective with the question of the real, with the way this real is put into discourse and into a narrative, they allow us to underline the potentially traumatogenic character of the scientific project. This observation invites us to distinguish between the practice of research and the situation of the expert assessment.
真实的问题
这篇文章借鉴了精神分析的教导,以探索“科学家”在面对对他们的要求时能够和不能保持的位置。它通过怪物和灾难的形象探索了对科学有效的转移。由于灾难的情况使个人和集体面对真实的问题,以及这种真实被置于话语和叙事中的方式,它们使我们能够强调科学项目潜在的创伤性特征。这一观察要求我们区分研究的实践和专家评估的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信