Diversion Of Recidivist Children According To Utilitarianism Aspects

Eko Saktiono, Arifah Uswatun Kossah, S. Sunaryo
{"title":"Diversion Of Recidivist Children According To Utilitarianism Aspects","authors":"Eko Saktiono, Arifah Uswatun Kossah, S. Sunaryo","doi":"10.22219/aclj.v3i3.21681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an act against legal norms, especially criminal law, children must be treated differently from adults. This is because children are a group of naturally weak people children who commit crimes should be lighter than those adults through what is known as restorative justice and Diversion (Indonesian law says it “Diversi”). However, then, Article 7 paragraph (2) of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law (Indonesian: UU SPPA), basically states that Diversi is only carried out if the criminal penalty for the act is less than 7 (seven) years and is not a repetition of a crime. Utilitarianism or Utilism puts benefit as the main goal of Benefit here is defined as happiness. So, good or bad or fair or not a law depends on whether the law gives happiness to humans or not. Through a normative juridical study that emphasizes the review of laws and literature studies, the authors find that a utilitarian review of Diversi to recidivist children is very likely to produce broad benefits for many people and has the potential to close the possibility of recidivist children committing criminal acts again. This is because, in Diversi, the benefits of overcoming the consequences of children's actions can be felt by the perpetrator's child, the victim, and their respective families through mutual agreement. In line with that, the principles of implementing the SPPA Law confirm that children must be addressed especially for the protection of their growth and development and to eliminate discrimination that differentiates the process between one child and another. It is hoped that with this literature review, legal products regarding juvenile justice can participate in guaranteeing the rights of recidivism children in Diversi as a method of overcoming crime by children.","PeriodicalId":250069,"journal":{"name":"Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ)","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v3i3.21681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an act against legal norms, especially criminal law, children must be treated differently from adults. This is because children are a group of naturally weak people children who commit crimes should be lighter than those adults through what is known as restorative justice and Diversion (Indonesian law says it “Diversi”). However, then, Article 7 paragraph (2) of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law (Indonesian: UU SPPA), basically states that Diversi is only carried out if the criminal penalty for the act is less than 7 (seven) years and is not a repetition of a crime. Utilitarianism or Utilism puts benefit as the main goal of Benefit here is defined as happiness. So, good or bad or fair or not a law depends on whether the law gives happiness to humans or not. Through a normative juridical study that emphasizes the review of laws and literature studies, the authors find that a utilitarian review of Diversi to recidivist children is very likely to produce broad benefits for many people and has the potential to close the possibility of recidivist children committing criminal acts again. This is because, in Diversi, the benefits of overcoming the consequences of children's actions can be felt by the perpetrator's child, the victim, and their respective families through mutual agreement. In line with that, the principles of implementing the SPPA Law confirm that children must be addressed especially for the protection of their growth and development and to eliminate discrimination that differentiates the process between one child and another. It is hoped that with this literature review, legal products regarding juvenile justice can participate in guaranteeing the rights of recidivism children in Diversi as a method of overcoming crime by children.
从功利主义角度看儿童惯犯的分流
在违反法律规范,特别是刑法的行为中,必须区别对待儿童和成人。这是因为儿童是一群天生软弱的人,通过所谓的恢复性司法和转移(印度尼西亚法律称之为“多样化”),犯罪的儿童应该比成年人轻。然而,《少年刑事司法制度法》(印度尼西亚语:UU SPPA)第7条第(2)款基本上规定,只有在对该行为的刑事处罚少于7(7)年且不是重复犯罪的情况下,才会执行多元化。功利主义或功利主义把利益作为主要目标这里的利益被定义为幸福。因此,法律的好坏,公平与否取决于法律是否给人类带来幸福。通过强调法律审查和文献研究的规范性司法研究,作者发现,对累犯儿童多样性的功利主义审查很可能为许多人带来广泛的利益,并有可能关闭累犯儿童再次犯罪的可能性。这是因为,在《多样性》中,通过相互协议,犯罪者的子女、受害者及其各自的家庭都能感受到克服儿童行为后果的好处。与此相一致的是,执行《儿童权利保护法》的原则确认,必须特别注意儿童问题,以保护他们的成长和发展,并消除在儿童与另一儿童之间造成差别的歧视。希望通过本文的文献综述,青少年司法相关法律产品能够作为克服儿童犯罪的一种手段,参与到多元社会中累犯儿童权利的保障中来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信