Assessment of perception and utility regarding flip classroom among MBBS students: A descriptive study

Ruqia Quansar, S. S. Khan, S. Dkhar
{"title":"Assessment of perception and utility regarding flip classroom among MBBS students: A descriptive study","authors":"Ruqia Quansar, S. S. Khan, S. Dkhar","doi":"10.4103/jimph.jimph_14_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: A flipped classroom is a type of blended learning technique. In modern times, the teaching techniques need to be improved and changed. The aim of the study was to assess the perception of students with regard to flipped classroom. Materials and Methods: The study was a descriptive cross-sectional study design. A total of 152 students participated in this study. Results: After watching the video and before the actual interaction, about 84.2% felt confident. About 56.6% of respondents thought flipped classrooms were superior to traditional classroom instruction. The flexibility of the “flipped classroom,” according to 44.1% of respondents, makes it the most useful feature. The aspect of flipped learning that 43.4% of students liked the most was learning about new ideas before class. A total of 98.2% thought they needed to be more accountable for their education. Conclusion: Although the flip classroom cannot completely replace the traditional classroom but when used in conjunction, it can help students learn more effectively. It has paved the path for improvements to teaching techniques and unquestionably produced a better manner of instruction.","PeriodicalId":314757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative Medicine and Public Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jimph.jimph_14_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A flipped classroom is a type of blended learning technique. In modern times, the teaching techniques need to be improved and changed. The aim of the study was to assess the perception of students with regard to flipped classroom. Materials and Methods: The study was a descriptive cross-sectional study design. A total of 152 students participated in this study. Results: After watching the video and before the actual interaction, about 84.2% felt confident. About 56.6% of respondents thought flipped classrooms were superior to traditional classroom instruction. The flexibility of the “flipped classroom,” according to 44.1% of respondents, makes it the most useful feature. The aspect of flipped learning that 43.4% of students liked the most was learning about new ideas before class. A total of 98.2% thought they needed to be more accountable for their education. Conclusion: Although the flip classroom cannot completely replace the traditional classroom but when used in conjunction, it can help students learn more effectively. It has paved the path for improvements to teaching techniques and unquestionably produced a better manner of instruction.
MBBS学生对翻转课堂的认知和效用评估:一项描述性研究
目的:翻转课堂是一种混合式学习技术。在现代,教学技术需要改进和改变。本研究的目的是评估学生对翻转课堂的看法。材料与方法:本研究采用描述性横断面研究设计。共有152名学生参与了本研究。结果:在观看视频和实际互动前,约84.2%的人有信心。约56.6%的受访者认为翻转课堂优于传统课堂教学。44.1%的受访者表示,“翻转课堂”的灵活性使其成为最有用的功能。43.4%的学生最喜欢翻转学习的方面是课前学习新知识。总共有98.2%的人认为他们需要对自己的教育更加负责。结论:翻转课堂虽然不能完全取代传统课堂,但结合起来使用,可以帮助学生更有效地学习。它为改进教学技术铺平了道路,毫无疑问产生了更好的教学方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信