Sorel: Sovereign Critique

W. Thayer
{"title":"Sorel: Sovereign Critique","authors":"W. Thayer","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823286744.003.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyzes Georges Sorel's Reflections on Violence from 1908. It explains how Sorel presents himself not just as a thinker of violence but as a violent thinker. In his work, Sorel does not produce an apology for violence, for war, or for the proletarian general strike that is undifferentiated within a single revolutionary conatus and destroy the relations of property and expropriation of the historical scene. The chapter mentions Sorel's evangelization of the violent strike that is upheld as the illegitimate means of pursuing just ends or his intention to confront legitimate but unjust regulation. Sorel is a violent thinker not because he adheres to the different kinds of de facto violence that the workers' strike poses against de jure violence but because of the technology through which Reflections of Violence feeds the violence that it aspires to interrupt.","PeriodicalId":225011,"journal":{"name":"Technologies of Critique","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technologies of Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823286744.003.0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter analyzes Georges Sorel's Reflections on Violence from 1908. It explains how Sorel presents himself not just as a thinker of violence but as a violent thinker. In his work, Sorel does not produce an apology for violence, for war, or for the proletarian general strike that is undifferentiated within a single revolutionary conatus and destroy the relations of property and expropriation of the historical scene. The chapter mentions Sorel's evangelization of the violent strike that is upheld as the illegitimate means of pursuing just ends or his intention to confront legitimate but unjust regulation. Sorel is a violent thinker not because he adheres to the different kinds of de facto violence that the workers' strike poses against de jure violence but because of the technology through which Reflections of Violence feeds the violence that it aspires to interrupt.
索雷尔:主权批判
本章分析了1908年以来乔治·索雷尔关于暴力的思考。它解释了索雷尔如何不仅把自己描绘成一个暴力思想家,而且是一个暴力思想家。在他的作品中,索雷尔并没有为暴力道歉,为战争道歉,也没有为无产阶级总罢工道歉,这在一个单一的革命状态下是没有区别的,破坏了历史场景中财产和征用的关系。这一章提到了索雷尔对暴力罢工的宣传,这种暴力罢工被认为是追求正义目的的非法手段,或者他的意图是对抗合法但不公正的监管。Sorel是一个暴力思想家,不是因为他坚持不同种类的事实上的暴力,工人罢工反对法律上的暴力,而是因为《暴力反思》通过这种技术来滋养它渴望打断的暴力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信