COMPARISON OF INFECTION RATES, QUARANTINE PERIODS, AND FEAR IN UNDERGRADUATE PHYSIOTHERAPY STUDENTS WHO HAD FACE-TO-FACE AND ONLINE EDUCATION DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A SINGLE-CENTER, CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

U. Koçak, Orhan Öztürk, Deniz Bayraktar, Derya ÖZER KAYA
{"title":"COMPARISON OF INFECTION RATES, QUARANTINE PERIODS, AND FEAR IN UNDERGRADUATE PHYSIOTHERAPY STUDENTS WHO HAD FACE-TO-FACE AND ONLINE EDUCATION DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A SINGLE-CENTER, CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY","authors":"U. Koçak, Orhan Öztürk, Deniz Bayraktar, Derya ÖZER KAYA","doi":"10.21653/tjpr.1011527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The objective of the present study was to compare the rates of COVID-19 infection and quarantine periods, and fear in undergraduate physiotherapy students who continued their educations as online or face-to-face. \nMethods: Three hundred and one students who continued their education as online (n= 144, for 1st and 4th degrees), or face-to-face under strict special precautions (n= 157, for 2nd and 3rd grades) during the 2020-2021 fall term were included. Demographic characteristics, COVID-19 infection diagnosis and quarantine due to contact were questioned via a structured online form. COVID-19 related fear was assessed by using the Fear of COVID-19 Scale. \nResults: No statistical differences were detected regarding demographical characteristics and COVID-19 infection rates between the groups (p> 0.05). The online education group had higher quarantine rates due to contact with an infected person (p= 0.040), while the face-to-face group reported higher COVID-19 related fear (p= 0.001). \nConclusion: The physiotherapy students who had a face-to-face education under special precautions had more COVID-19 related fear, however less quarantine rate, and similar infection rates in comparison to online educated counterparts.","PeriodicalId":289913,"journal":{"name":"Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.1011527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of the present study was to compare the rates of COVID-19 infection and quarantine periods, and fear in undergraduate physiotherapy students who continued their educations as online or face-to-face. Methods: Three hundred and one students who continued their education as online (n= 144, for 1st and 4th degrees), or face-to-face under strict special precautions (n= 157, for 2nd and 3rd grades) during the 2020-2021 fall term were included. Demographic characteristics, COVID-19 infection diagnosis and quarantine due to contact were questioned via a structured online form. COVID-19 related fear was assessed by using the Fear of COVID-19 Scale. Results: No statistical differences were detected regarding demographical characteristics and COVID-19 infection rates between the groups (p> 0.05). The online education group had higher quarantine rates due to contact with an infected person (p= 0.040), while the face-to-face group reported higher COVID-19 related fear (p= 0.001). Conclusion: The physiotherapy students who had a face-to-face education under special precautions had more COVID-19 related fear, however less quarantine rate, and similar infection rates in comparison to online educated counterparts.
COVID-19大流行期间接受面对面和在线教育的本科物理治疗学生的感染率、隔离期和恐惧的比较:一项单中心横断面研究
目的:本研究的目的是比较在线或面对面继续接受教育的物理治疗本科学生的COVID-19感染率、隔离时间和恐惧。方法:纳入了301名在2020-2021秋季学期继续接受在线教育的学生(n= 144,一年级和四年级),或在严格特殊预防措施下接受面对面教育的学生(n= 157,二年级和三年级)。通过结构化的在线表格对人口统计学特征、COVID-19感染诊断和接触隔离进行了询问。采用COVID-19恐惧量表评估与COVID-19相关的恐惧。结果:两组间人口统计学特征及新冠肺炎感染率差异无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。在线教育组因接触感染者而被隔离的比率较高(p= 0.040),而面对面教育组报告的与COVID-19相关的恐惧较高(p= 0.001)。结论:与在线教育的学生相比,接受特殊预防措施面对面教育的物理治疗学生有更多的新冠肺炎相关恐惧,但隔离率更低,感染率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信