High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Is the More Interventionist Way the Right Way to Go?

Anna Orosz
{"title":"High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Is the More Interventionist Way the Right Way to Go?","authors":"Anna Orosz","doi":"10.47706/kkifpr.2023.1.134-145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Office of the High Representative was established by the Dayton Peace Agreement in 1995 to assist the implementation of the civilian aspects of the agreement. Since then, the High Representative (HR) has been authorised to intervene directly in domestic affairs if the HR considers it necessary. The use of the so-called Bonn powers and its impact on the peace and state-building process divides both policymakers and experts. This paper draws attention to the fact that the role of the HR cannot be assessed without considering the constantly changing domestic and international political context. The paper also shows that the extensive use of these executive powers has played a controversial role in achieving the original goals of the Agreement.","PeriodicalId":365676,"journal":{"name":"Foreign Policy Review","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foreign Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47706/kkifpr.2023.1.134-145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Office of the High Representative was established by the Dayton Peace Agreement in 1995 to assist the implementation of the civilian aspects of the agreement. Since then, the High Representative (HR) has been authorised to intervene directly in domestic affairs if the HR considers it necessary. The use of the so-called Bonn powers and its impact on the peace and state-building process divides both policymakers and experts. This paper draws attention to the fact that the role of the HR cannot be assessed without considering the constantly changing domestic and international political context. The paper also shows that the extensive use of these executive powers has played a controversial role in achieving the original goals of the Agreement.
驻波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那高级代表:加强干预是正确的道路吗?
高级代表办事处是根据《代顿和平协定》于1995年设立的,目的是协助执行该协定的民事方面。从那时起,高级代表被授权在其认为必要时直接干预国内事务。所谓的波恩权力的使用及其对和平与国家建设进程的影响在政策制定者和专家之间存在分歧。本文提请注意这样一个事实,即如果不考虑不断变化的国内和国际政治环境,就无法评估人力资源的作用。本文还表明,这些行政权力的广泛使用在实现《协定》的最初目标方面发挥了有争议的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信