Is there an “intergenerational gap” in transport usage? Comparing transport preferences of seniors and students

J. Kos-Łabędowicz
{"title":"Is there an “intergenerational gap” in transport usage? Comparing transport preferences of seniors and students","authors":"J. Kos-Łabędowicz","doi":"10.15611/pn.2019.7.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary: The purpose of this paper is to examine the transport preferences of seniors and to identify potential differences in their use of transport compared to those of a younger generation, utilising literature analysis and subsequent descriptive and statistical analyses of data. The article outlines the problem of an ageing society and indicates factors important for the elderly when using the transport system. The results of direct research concerning the declared preferences of seniors and students in the choice of means of transport depending on the destination are presented. Seniors indicated public transport most often, but most people who could use a car preferred that choice for at least one of their destinations. For students, both car and public transport were also the two most frequently chosen means of transport. Despite the limited comparability of both groups, two issues are noteworthy – the similar proportions of preference for individual travel destinations, and the means of transport with definitely different levels of possibility of using a car. This suggests that in the case of seniors we are dealing with behaviour resulting from reasons other than transport preferences. Is there an “intergenerational gap” in transport usage?...","PeriodicalId":307844,"journal":{"name":"Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2019.7.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: The purpose of this paper is to examine the transport preferences of seniors and to identify potential differences in their use of transport compared to those of a younger generation, utilising literature analysis and subsequent descriptive and statistical analyses of data. The article outlines the problem of an ageing society and indicates factors important for the elderly when using the transport system. The results of direct research concerning the declared preferences of seniors and students in the choice of means of transport depending on the destination are presented. Seniors indicated public transport most often, but most people who could use a car preferred that choice for at least one of their destinations. For students, both car and public transport were also the two most frequently chosen means of transport. Despite the limited comparability of both groups, two issues are noteworthy – the similar proportions of preference for individual travel destinations, and the means of transport with definitely different levels of possibility of using a car. This suggests that in the case of seniors we are dealing with behaviour resulting from reasons other than transport preferences. Is there an “intergenerational gap” in transport usage?...
交通工具的使用是否存在“代际差距”?比较老年人和学生的交通偏好
摘要:本文的目的是研究老年人的交通偏好,并确定与年轻一代相比,他们使用交通工具的潜在差异,利用文献分析和随后的数据描述性和统计分析。文章概述了老龄化社会的问题,并指出了老年人在使用交通系统时的重要因素。直接研究的结果,关于申报偏好的老年人和学生在交通工具的选择取决于目的地。老年人最常选择公共交通工具,但大多数可以开车的人至少会选择其中一个目的地。对于学生来说,私家车和公共交通也是最常选择的两种交通工具。尽管这两个群体的可比性有限,但有两个问题值得注意——对个人旅游目的地的偏好比例相似,以及使用汽车的可能性明显不同的交通工具。这表明,在老年人的案例中,我们正在处理由交通偏好以外的原因导致的行为。交通工具的使用是否存在“代际差距”?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信