Human-wildlife conflict around Midre-Kebid Abo Monastry, Gurage Zone, Southwest Ethiopia

Amare Yilmato, S. Takele
{"title":"Human-wildlife conflict around Midre-Kebid Abo Monastry, Gurage Zone, Southwest Ethiopia","authors":"Amare Yilmato, S. Takele","doi":"10.5897/ijbc2019.1314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This human-wildlife conflict study was carried out around Midre-Kebid Abo Monastry. A descriptive survey design method was used and both qualitative and quantitative data were collected using questionnaires. Field experiment was carried out on two selected crops - maize and enset, to estimate crop damage by wild animals. Resource competition (46%), increased wildlife population (42.5%) and livestock populations (11.5%) were the major causes of conflict identified in the area. Wheat and maize were the most affected crops in the area with an estimate loss of 155.29 ± 12/kg/year and 106.15±12.3/kg/year, respectively. The average loss of enset obtained from estimation of 0.36 ha in four counts was 36 kg. On the other hand, the average loss of maize from estimation of 0.12 ha in four counts was 48 cobs (9.6 kg). Therefore, estimated damage based on the total coverage of enset (32 ha) and maize (42 ha) has become 3200 and 3360 kg, respectively. The most known problematic wild animals in the study area were apes (86.2%) followed by monkey (71.3%) and hyena (56.3%). Albeit there is an intense human-wildlife conflict in the study area, majority of the respondents (64.5%) have positive perception towards wildlife conservation. Different crop/livestock protection mechanisms, including guarding, chasing, hunting, fencing, cooperative guarding, guarding using dogs, trapping and scarecrow are used by the local community. The use unpalatable crops as buffer crops enforce environment and forest related laws and local government engagement in creating awareness about wildlife conservation and compensatory schemes are important to lessen the problem. \n \n   \n \n Key words: Crop loss, Human-Wildlife Conflict, Midre-kebid Monastery.","PeriodicalId":143839,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/ijbc2019.1314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This human-wildlife conflict study was carried out around Midre-Kebid Abo Monastry. A descriptive survey design method was used and both qualitative and quantitative data were collected using questionnaires. Field experiment was carried out on two selected crops - maize and enset, to estimate crop damage by wild animals. Resource competition (46%), increased wildlife population (42.5%) and livestock populations (11.5%) were the major causes of conflict identified in the area. Wheat and maize were the most affected crops in the area with an estimate loss of 155.29 ± 12/kg/year and 106.15±12.3/kg/year, respectively. The average loss of enset obtained from estimation of 0.36 ha in four counts was 36 kg. On the other hand, the average loss of maize from estimation of 0.12 ha in four counts was 48 cobs (9.6 kg). Therefore, estimated damage based on the total coverage of enset (32 ha) and maize (42 ha) has become 3200 and 3360 kg, respectively. The most known problematic wild animals in the study area were apes (86.2%) followed by monkey (71.3%) and hyena (56.3%). Albeit there is an intense human-wildlife conflict in the study area, majority of the respondents (64.5%) have positive perception towards wildlife conservation. Different crop/livestock protection mechanisms, including guarding, chasing, hunting, fencing, cooperative guarding, guarding using dogs, trapping and scarecrow are used by the local community. The use unpalatable crops as buffer crops enforce environment and forest related laws and local government engagement in creating awareness about wildlife conservation and compensatory schemes are important to lessen the problem.   Key words: Crop loss, Human-Wildlife Conflict, Midre-kebid Monastery.
埃塞俄比亚西南部古拉格地区,Midre-Kebid Abo修道院周围的人类与野生动物冲突
这项人类与野生动物冲突的研究是在Midre-Kebid Abo修道院附近进行的。采用描述性调查设计方法,采用问卷调查法收集定性和定量资料。为了估计野生动物对作物的危害,选用玉米和玉米两种作物进行了田间试验。资源竞争(46%)、野生动物数量增加(42.5%)和牲畜数量增加(11.5%)是该地区冲突的主要原因。小麦和玉米是该地区受影响最大的作物,估计损失分别为155.29±12 /kg/年和106.15±12.3/kg/年。在4个计数中,估算0.36公顷的平均损失为36公斤。另一方面,四次0.12公顷估算的玉米平均损失为48穗轴(9.6公斤)。因此,基于玉米(32公顷)和玉米(42公顷)总覆盖面积的估计损失分别为3200千克和3360千克。研究区已知的问题野生动物最多的是类人猿(86.2%),其次是猴子(71.3%)和鬣狗(56.3%)。尽管研究区内人与野生动物冲突激烈,但大多数受访者(64.5%)对野生动物保护持积极态度。当地社区采用不同的农作物/牲畜保护机制,包括看守、追逐、狩猎、围栏、合作看守、用狗看守、诱捕和稻草人。使用难吃的作物作为缓冲作物,执行环境和森林相关法律,地方政府参与提高野生动物保护意识和补偿计划,对减少问题很重要。关键词:作物损失,人与野生动物冲突,米德-克比德寺
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信