The Disposition to Cheating in Sport Questionnaire (CDED-KE) Adaptation in Kenyan University Students

Gabriella Hideg
{"title":"The Disposition to Cheating in Sport Questionnaire (CDED-KE) Adaptation in Kenyan University Students","authors":"Gabriella Hideg","doi":"10.37284/eajes.6.2.1380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study contains partial results of a larger, comprehensive international research. University students from two countries (Hungary, Kenya) participated in the research. On the one hand, the goal was the cultural adaptation of internationally validated questionnaires related to the topics of fair play, sportsmanship, cheating, and gamesmanship in Kenya, as well as their Hungarian validation. The aim is to present the results of the validation procedure in Kenya, as well as the Kenyan cultural adaptation of an internationally validated index/scale among university students. The Disposition to Cheating in Sport Questionnaire (CDED), developed by Ponseti et. al (2012), was employed to explore the level of cheating and gamesmanship. The reliability of the questionnaires was examined using Cronbach’s Alpha values. For the CDED, the Cronbach’s Alpha (α) is also 0.765. Based on the results, the scales were found to be valid in the Kenyan sample, the adaptation was successful, and the name of the questionnaire is CDED-KE. 1,278 university students participated in the study. 54.9% (701 people) are men, 45.1% (577 people) are women. In terms of age, the youngest participant was 18, while the oldest was 50, and the average age was 23.6 years (SD = 5.022). The students filled out the questionnaire online and on paper. In addition to descriptive statistics, a two-sample T-test, a one-way ANOVA test, and Pearson’s correlation were used. The level of significance was set at 0.001 or 0.005. IBM SPSS 26.0 software was used for analysis. When examining the variables, it was found that there were no significant results in the two examined subscales (gamesmanship and cheating) of the questionnaire with regard to gender, major studied and the field of study, sporting habits (sport, type of sport). Thus, these variables do not affect young people’s attitudes towards accepting and using cheating and gamesmanship. However, the acceptance of gamesmanship decreases with increasing age, although the weak, negative relationship cannot be ignored. According to the results, the adaptation procedure of the CDED-KE questionnaire was successful, the questionnaire is reliable and applicable","PeriodicalId":158165,"journal":{"name":"East African Journal of Education Studies","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African Journal of Education Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.6.2.1380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study contains partial results of a larger, comprehensive international research. University students from two countries (Hungary, Kenya) participated in the research. On the one hand, the goal was the cultural adaptation of internationally validated questionnaires related to the topics of fair play, sportsmanship, cheating, and gamesmanship in Kenya, as well as their Hungarian validation. The aim is to present the results of the validation procedure in Kenya, as well as the Kenyan cultural adaptation of an internationally validated index/scale among university students. The Disposition to Cheating in Sport Questionnaire (CDED), developed by Ponseti et. al (2012), was employed to explore the level of cheating and gamesmanship. The reliability of the questionnaires was examined using Cronbach’s Alpha values. For the CDED, the Cronbach’s Alpha (α) is also 0.765. Based on the results, the scales were found to be valid in the Kenyan sample, the adaptation was successful, and the name of the questionnaire is CDED-KE. 1,278 university students participated in the study. 54.9% (701 people) are men, 45.1% (577 people) are women. In terms of age, the youngest participant was 18, while the oldest was 50, and the average age was 23.6 years (SD = 5.022). The students filled out the questionnaire online and on paper. In addition to descriptive statistics, a two-sample T-test, a one-way ANOVA test, and Pearson’s correlation were used. The level of significance was set at 0.001 or 0.005. IBM SPSS 26.0 software was used for analysis. When examining the variables, it was found that there were no significant results in the two examined subscales (gamesmanship and cheating) of the questionnaire with regard to gender, major studied and the field of study, sporting habits (sport, type of sport). Thus, these variables do not affect young people’s attitudes towards accepting and using cheating and gamesmanship. However, the acceptance of gamesmanship decreases with increasing age, although the weak, negative relationship cannot be ignored. According to the results, the adaptation procedure of the CDED-KE questionnaire was successful, the questionnaire is reliable and applicable
肯尼亚大学生体育作弊倾向问卷(cd - ke)的适应
本研究包含了一个更大、更全面的国际研究的部分结果。来自两个国家(匈牙利、肯尼亚)的大学生参与了研究。一方面,我们的目标是对国际认可的问卷进行文化调整,这些问卷涉及肯尼亚的公平竞争、体育精神、作弊和游戏技巧等主题,以及匈牙利的认可。目的是展示肯尼亚验证程序的结果,以及肯尼亚在大学生中对国际验证指数/量表的文化适应。本研究采用Ponseti等人(2012)开发的体育作弊倾向问卷(CDED)来探讨作弊和竞技技巧的水平。问卷的信度采用Cronbach’s Alpha值进行检验。对于CDED, Cronbach 's Alpha (α)也是0.765。根据结果,量表在肯尼亚样本中有效,适配成功,问卷名称为cd - ke。1278名大学生参与了这项研究。男性占54.9%(701人),女性占45.1%(577人)。年龄方面,年龄最小的18岁,年龄最大的50岁,平均年龄23.6岁(SD = 5.022)。学生们在网上和纸上填写了调查问卷。除描述性统计外,还使用了双样本t检验、单因素方差分析检验和Pearson相关检验。显著性水平设为0.001或0.005。采用IBM SPSS 26.0软件进行分析。在对变量进行检查时,我们发现问卷的两个被检查的子量表(游戏技巧和作弊)在性别、所学专业和学习领域、运动习惯(运动、运动类型)方面没有显著的结果。因此,这些变量不会影响年轻人对接受和使用欺骗和游戏的态度。然而,对小动作的接受程度随着年龄的增长而下降,尽管这种微弱的负相关关系不可忽视。结果表明,cd - ke问卷的改编程序是成功的,该问卷具有可靠性和适用性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书