Comparison of viewpoint-invariant template matchings

Guillermo Angel Perez Lopez, H. Y. Kim
{"title":"Comparison of viewpoint-invariant template matchings","authors":"Guillermo Angel Perez Lopez, H. Y. Kim","doi":"10.1109/ITS.2014.6947982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SIFT, Forapro and Ciratefi are three rotation and scale invariant template matching (or keypoint matching) algorithms. They can become viewpoint-invariant using the view simulation technique, compensating the perspective deformation by simulated affine transformations, yielding the algorithms named ASIFT (Affine-invariant SIFT), Aforapro and Aciratefi. We compare the three algorithms, evaluating their performances in different situations. We focus our attention especially to situations with illumination changes and in the presence of repetitive similar patterns. The results show that all the three algorithms have strengths and weaknesses and the user should choose the best suited algorithm according to the intended application.","PeriodicalId":359348,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Telecommunications Symposium (ITS)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Telecommunications Symposium (ITS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITS.2014.6947982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

SIFT, Forapro and Ciratefi are three rotation and scale invariant template matching (or keypoint matching) algorithms. They can become viewpoint-invariant using the view simulation technique, compensating the perspective deformation by simulated affine transformations, yielding the algorithms named ASIFT (Affine-invariant SIFT), Aforapro and Aciratefi. We compare the three algorithms, evaluating their performances in different situations. We focus our attention especially to situations with illumination changes and in the presence of repetitive similar patterns. The results show that all the three algorithms have strengths and weaknesses and the user should choose the best suited algorithm according to the intended application.
比较视点不变模板匹配
SIFT、Forapro和Ciratefi是三种旋转和尺度不变模板匹配(或关键点匹配)算法。它们可以使用视图模拟技术实现视点不变,通过模拟仿射变换补偿视点变形,从而产生ASIFT(仿射不变SIFT)、Aforapro和Aciratefi算法。我们比较了这三种算法,评估了它们在不同情况下的性能。我们将注意力集中在光照变化和重复相似模式的情况下。结果表明,三种算法各有优缺点,用户应根据实际应用选择最适合的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信