“The Visual Poetry of the Work”: Critique, Form, and Life in the Art of Mona Hatoum and the Language of Theodor Adorno

J. Sacks
{"title":"“The Visual Poetry of the Work”: Critique, Form, and Life in the Art of Mona Hatoum and the Language of Theodor Adorno","authors":"J. Sacks","doi":"10.1215/26410478-10235964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article addresses the work of the German-language philosopher and theorist Theodor Adorno and the Palestinian Artist Mona Hatoum in order to ask after the form of the subject and the sense of life privileged in critique. I consider the form of the subject and the sense of the social presumed and generalized in Adorno in relation to his reading of Hegel and his discussion of race, anti-Blackness, anti-Semitism, and “the American landscape” in aphorisms twenty-eight and sixty-eight in Minima Moralia. Drawing on scholarship in Black and Indigenous Studies, I argue that in Adorno a particular sense of the subject, with and against Adorno’s language, is advanced: the subject of the law, right, property, and whiteness, what one might call the subject of settler life. I suggest that this is a sense of the subject that privileges its ethicality in relation to social violence and the world, and I notice that this privilege is constitutive of what critique, for Adorno, is. I then turn to Hatoum and offer a reading of several of her works and installations alongside her discussion of her art in a series of interviews, where I focus on Light at the End (1989), Present Tense (1996), Hair Lines (1979), and Socle du Monde (1992-1993). I study Hatoum’s work in order to understand the sense of the social it enlivens, and the sense of being and language it makes manifest, and I argue that, in Hatoum’s work, art becomes critique, critique becomes a theorization of the social, and theorization becomes a temporal practice of sociality, an inessential, inidentical sharing in language and form. In Hatoum’s art, a sociality of collective form displaces the critical terms of self-possession, self-orientation, and philosophical self-reflection, where property is unmoored as a logic of reading and life and a principle of form.","PeriodicalId":432097,"journal":{"name":"Critical Times","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Times","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/26410478-10235964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article addresses the work of the German-language philosopher and theorist Theodor Adorno and the Palestinian Artist Mona Hatoum in order to ask after the form of the subject and the sense of life privileged in critique. I consider the form of the subject and the sense of the social presumed and generalized in Adorno in relation to his reading of Hegel and his discussion of race, anti-Blackness, anti-Semitism, and “the American landscape” in aphorisms twenty-eight and sixty-eight in Minima Moralia. Drawing on scholarship in Black and Indigenous Studies, I argue that in Adorno a particular sense of the subject, with and against Adorno’s language, is advanced: the subject of the law, right, property, and whiteness, what one might call the subject of settler life. I suggest that this is a sense of the subject that privileges its ethicality in relation to social violence and the world, and I notice that this privilege is constitutive of what critique, for Adorno, is. I then turn to Hatoum and offer a reading of several of her works and installations alongside her discussion of her art in a series of interviews, where I focus on Light at the End (1989), Present Tense (1996), Hair Lines (1979), and Socle du Monde (1992-1993). I study Hatoum’s work in order to understand the sense of the social it enlivens, and the sense of being and language it makes manifest, and I argue that, in Hatoum’s work, art becomes critique, critique becomes a theorization of the social, and theorization becomes a temporal practice of sociality, an inessential, inidentical sharing in language and form. In Hatoum’s art, a sociality of collective form displaces the critical terms of self-possession, self-orientation, and philosophical self-reflection, where property is unmoored as a logic of reading and life and a principle of form.
“作品的视觉诗歌”:莫娜·哈图姆艺术中的批判、形式和生命与西奥多·阿多诺的语言
本文探讨了德语哲学家和理论家西奥多·阿多诺和巴勒斯坦艺术家莫娜·哈图姆的作品,以追问主体的形式和在批判中享有特权的生命感。我考虑了主题的形式以及阿多诺的社会假定和概括的意义,与他对黑格尔的阅读以及他对种族,反黑人,反犹太主义的讨论,以及《道德最小化》第28和68句格言中的“美国景观”有关。根据黑人和土著研究的学术研究,我认为,在阿多诺身上,一种特殊的主体意识,与阿多诺的语言相抵触,是先进的:法律,权利,财产和白人的主体,人们可以称之为定居者生活的主体。我认为,这是主体的一种感觉,在与社会暴力和世界的关系中,赋予其伦理特权,我注意到,对阿多诺来说,这种特权构成了批判。然后我转向Hatoum,并提供了她的几件作品和装置的阅读,以及她在一系列采访中对她的艺术的讨论,其中我关注的是《光在尽头》(1989)、《现在时》(1996)、《发际线》(1979)和《世界》(1992-1993)。我研究哈图姆的作品是为了理解它所激活的社会意义,以及它所体现的存在和语言的意义,我认为,在哈图姆的作品中,艺术变成了批判,批判变成了社会的理论化,而理论化变成了社会性的暂时实践,一种无关紧要的,不相同的语言和形式的分享。在哈图姆的艺术中,集体形式的社会性取代了自我占有、自我导向和哲学自我反思的批判性术语,在这里,财产作为一种阅读和生活的逻辑以及一种形式原则而被解除了束缚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信