The Concept of Foreign Arbitration Award in the Light of New York Convention, 1958

H. Mafi, Mahshid Eshaghi
{"title":"The Concept of Foreign Arbitration Award in the Light of New York Convention, 1958","authors":"H. Mafi, Mahshid Eshaghi","doi":"10.11648/j.ijls.20220501.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, New York 1958, is a comprehensive instrument which facilitates the enforcement of arbitral decisions. The New York Convention Compared to its predecessor, the Geneva Convention 1927, on the Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards has gained more flexibility and acceptance among UN member states. In accordance with Article 1, this Convention is applicable in a State other than the State where the recognition and enforcement of such awards are sought, or to arbitral awards not considered to be domestic awards. Therefore, the scope of the application of this Convention depends on what the notions of “arbitrator’s award” and “foreign arbitration award” are; because these two notions can determine which awards should be executed under the rules of the Convention and gain its benefits. However, the Convention gives no clear definition of foreign arbitral award. Under the New York Convention two types of foreign arbitral awards are recognized; arbitral awards that are not considered domestic and arbitral awards rendered in the territory of the state other than the state of the recognition and enforcement of award. In consequence it might be said the New York Convention is based on two criteria with different interpretations of which the territorial criterion is the most important one in comparison with functional criterion. So this paper aims to clarify the concept mentioned as one of Convention’s requirements in terms of executive scope.","PeriodicalId":375311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Society","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20220501.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, New York 1958, is a comprehensive instrument which facilitates the enforcement of arbitral decisions. The New York Convention Compared to its predecessor, the Geneva Convention 1927, on the Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards has gained more flexibility and acceptance among UN member states. In accordance with Article 1, this Convention is applicable in a State other than the State where the recognition and enforcement of such awards are sought, or to arbitral awards not considered to be domestic awards. Therefore, the scope of the application of this Convention depends on what the notions of “arbitrator’s award” and “foreign arbitration award” are; because these two notions can determine which awards should be executed under the rules of the Convention and gain its benefits. However, the Convention gives no clear definition of foreign arbitral award. Under the New York Convention two types of foreign arbitral awards are recognized; arbitral awards that are not considered domestic and arbitral awards rendered in the territory of the state other than the state of the recognition and enforcement of award. In consequence it might be said the New York Convention is based on two criteria with different interpretations of which the territorial criterion is the most important one in comparison with functional criterion. So this paper aims to clarify the concept mentioned as one of Convention’s requirements in terms of executive scope.
从1958年《纽约公约》看外国仲裁裁决的概念
1958年纽约《承认及执行外国仲裁裁决公约》是一项促进执行仲裁裁决的综合性文书。《纽约公约》与其前身《1927年日内瓦公约》相比,《外国仲裁裁决执行公约》在联合国成员国中具有更大的灵活性和可接受性。根据第一条,本公约适用于寻求承认和执行这种裁决的国家以外的国家,或适用于不被视为国内裁决的仲裁裁决。因此,本公约的适用范围取决于“仲裁员裁决”和“外国仲裁裁决”的概念是什么;因为这两个概念可以决定根据《公约》的规则应执行哪些裁决并获得其利益。但是,《公约》对外国仲裁裁决没有明确的定义。根据《纽约公约》,承认两种类型的外国仲裁裁决;不被视为国内的仲裁裁决,以及在承认和执行裁决国以外的国家领土内作出的仲裁裁决。因此,可以说《纽约公约》是基于两种不同解释的标准,与功能标准相比,领土标准是最重要的标准。因此,本文旨在从执行范围的角度阐明作为公约要求之一的这一概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信