Electronic Justice in an Arbitration Procedure: New Challenges and Adaptation of Judicial Proceedings

Yuriy A. Kantser
{"title":"Electronic Justice in an Arbitration Procedure: New Challenges and Adaptation of Judicial Proceedings","authors":"Yuriy A. Kantser","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-2-36-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of restrictive measures, procedural mechanisms that allow the use of e-justice resources came in handy. The courts introduce special conditions for the reception of citizens, meetings are recommended to be transferred to a remote format, the work of commercial organizations is carried out remotely or according to special schedules, the elementary movement of representatives of the parties to the dispute across the country is complicated, which means that getting to the court session is often difficult. In this regard, the discussion of the elements of electronic justice that have already been introduced into procedural legislation and those that have appeared again (familiarization with the case materials at a distance, online meeting) is highly relevant.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-2-36-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the context of restrictive measures, procedural mechanisms that allow the use of e-justice resources came in handy. The courts introduce special conditions for the reception of citizens, meetings are recommended to be transferred to a remote format, the work of commercial organizations is carried out remotely or according to special schedules, the elementary movement of representatives of the parties to the dispute across the country is complicated, which means that getting to the court session is often difficult. In this regard, the discussion of the elements of electronic justice that have already been introduced into procedural legislation and those that have appeared again (familiarization with the case materials at a distance, online meeting) is highly relevant.
仲裁程序中的电子司法:司法程序的新挑战与适应
在采取限制性措施的情况下,允许使用电子司法资源的程序机制派上了用场。法院为接待公民制定了特殊条件,会议被建议转移到远程格式,商业组织的工作被远程或根据特殊时间表进行,全国各地争议各方代表的基本运动是复杂的,这意味着到达法院开庭往往是困难的。在这方面,讨论已经纳入程序立法的电子司法要素和再次出现的要素(在远程在线会议上熟悉案件材料)是非常相关的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信