Preliminary Efforts to Define, Assess, and Improve Students’ Ability to Make “Connections” as Part of Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset

M. Vigeant, R. Alan Cheville, Charles J. Kim, M. Prince, E. Jablonski, J. Tranquillo
{"title":"Preliminary Efforts to Define, Assess, and Improve Students’ Ability to Make “Connections” as Part of Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset","authors":"M. Vigeant, R. Alan Cheville, Charles J. Kim, M. Prince, E. Jablonski, J. Tranquillo","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2018.8659323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Work in progress (research-to-practice). The entrepreneurial mindset, as articulated by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network or KEEN, rests on a foundation of three “C”s - Curiosity, Connections, and Creating value. In prior work, we developed an approach to assess students’ situational curiosity in response to class activities. We discovered that the creation of real artifacts excited student curiosity and explored the extent to which open-ended problem solving did as well. We have also proposed rubric-based assessments of student designs as a measure of value-creation. The second of the three “C”s, connections, has presented assessment challenges to this point.In this work, we discuss our literature review and search for valid and reliable instruments and subscales for connections. We propose a “2I” model where connections is defined as the ability to “integrate” knowledge to provide “insights”. We also propose an in-class activity similar to a brainstorming exercise already in use in many design-based courses. We have developed a rubric for assessing results of this exercise that can be used to both assess participants’ facility with forming connections and as the basis for a conversation with students about how to make more meaningful connections. Further, faculty can use this activity to stimulate students’ idea generation about course topics. We have tested this approach in two settings, and find initial results promising. We continue to seek feedback from the community as we work to turn this into a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of connections through the “2I” model.","PeriodicalId":354904,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8659323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Work in progress (research-to-practice). The entrepreneurial mindset, as articulated by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network or KEEN, rests on a foundation of three “C”s - Curiosity, Connections, and Creating value. In prior work, we developed an approach to assess students’ situational curiosity in response to class activities. We discovered that the creation of real artifacts excited student curiosity and explored the extent to which open-ended problem solving did as well. We have also proposed rubric-based assessments of student designs as a measure of value-creation. The second of the three “C”s, connections, has presented assessment challenges to this point.In this work, we discuss our literature review and search for valid and reliable instruments and subscales for connections. We propose a “2I” model where connections is defined as the ability to “integrate” knowledge to provide “insights”. We also propose an in-class activity similar to a brainstorming exercise already in use in many design-based courses. We have developed a rubric for assessing results of this exercise that can be used to both assess participants’ facility with forming connections and as the basis for a conversation with students about how to make more meaningful connections. Further, faculty can use this activity to stimulate students’ idea generation about course topics. We have tested this approach in two settings, and find initial results promising. We continue to seek feedback from the community as we work to turn this into a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of connections through the “2I” model.
定义、评估和提高学生建立“联系”能力的初步努力,作为培养创业心态的一部分
正在进行的工作(从研究到实践)。正如Kern创业工程网络(KEEN)所阐述的那样,创业心态建立在三个“C”的基础上——好奇心(Curiosity)、人脉(Connections)和创造价值(Creating value)。在之前的工作中,我们开发了一种方法来评估学生对课堂活动的情境好奇心。我们发现,真正的人工制品的创造激发了学生的好奇心,并探索了开放式问题解决的程度。我们还建议对学生的设计进行基于标准的评估,作为价值创造的衡量标准。三个“C”中的第二个“连接”在这一点上给评估带来了挑战。在这项工作中,我们讨论了我们的文献综述,并寻找有效和可靠的工具和子量表的连接。我们提出了一个“2I”模型,其中连接被定义为“整合”知识以提供“见解”的能力。我们还提出了一个课堂活动,类似于许多基于设计的课程中已经使用的头脑风暴练习。我们已经制定了一个评估这个练习结果的标准,既可以用来评估参与者形成联系的能力,也可以作为与学生讨论如何建立更有意义的联系的基础。此外,教师可以利用这个活动来激发学生对课程主题的想法。我们已经在两种环境中测试了这种方法,并发现了初步的结果。我们继续寻求社会各界的反馈意见,努力将其转变为通过“2I”模式评估连接的有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信