Electronic Mail Privacy in The Workplace: E-Mail Shows Need for Legislative Action, But Opportunity May Have Been Missed

David M. Snyder
{"title":"Electronic Mail Privacy in The Workplace: E-Mail Shows Need for Legislative Action, But Opportunity May Have Been Missed","authors":"David M. Snyder","doi":"10.2190/410E-V5CW-9DAC-5HJK","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most rapidly evolving areas of employment law is privacy. Tech­ nological innovation in the workplace continually challenges our conceptions of privacy. E-mail is the latest tool to exceed the grasp of existing privacy law. The common law's inability to adapt to e-mail exemplifies the need for legislative action to protect employee privacy. This article explores possible legislative solutions and attempts to identify procedures that reflect the core values of those solutions. One of the most rapidly evolving areas of employment law is privacy [1]. The right to privacy in general is a young concept, \"discovered\" in 1890 by Samuel Warren and Supreme Court Justice-to-be Louis Brandeis [1, 2]. The authors of The Right to Privacy were alarmed by the \"modern enterprise and invention\" of turn-of-the-century technology, particularly the rapid dissemination of informa­ tion via the burgeoning field of mass communication [2]. The \"instantaneous photographs and newspaper enterprise\" threatened not only to \"proclaim [ ] from the housetops\" what was \"whispered in closets\" and ruin reputations, but also, Brandeis and Warren feared, to invade the \"spiritual\" value of the \"inviolate personality\" [2, p. 205]. Thus, invasion of privacy would cause damage beyond reputation to affect \"the estimate of [one's] self and upon his feelings\" [2, p. 197]. Since then, legal scholars have struggled to categorize the bundle of interests contained within the \"inviolate personality.\" Dean Prosser reduced the privacy","PeriodicalId":371129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/410E-V5CW-9DAC-5HJK","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most rapidly evolving areas of employment law is privacy. Tech­ nological innovation in the workplace continually challenges our conceptions of privacy. E-mail is the latest tool to exceed the grasp of existing privacy law. The common law's inability to adapt to e-mail exemplifies the need for legislative action to protect employee privacy. This article explores possible legislative solutions and attempts to identify procedures that reflect the core values of those solutions. One of the most rapidly evolving areas of employment law is privacy [1]. The right to privacy in general is a young concept, "discovered" in 1890 by Samuel Warren and Supreme Court Justice-to-be Louis Brandeis [1, 2]. The authors of The Right to Privacy were alarmed by the "modern enterprise and invention" of turn-of-the-century technology, particularly the rapid dissemination of informa­ tion via the burgeoning field of mass communication [2]. The "instantaneous photographs and newspaper enterprise" threatened not only to "proclaim [ ] from the housetops" what was "whispered in closets" and ruin reputations, but also, Brandeis and Warren feared, to invade the "spiritual" value of the "inviolate personality" [2, p. 205]. Thus, invasion of privacy would cause damage beyond reputation to affect "the estimate of [one's] self and upon his feelings" [2, p. 197]. Since then, legal scholars have struggled to categorize the bundle of interests contained within the "inviolate personality." Dean Prosser reduced the privacy
工作场所的电子邮件隐私:电子邮件需要立法行动,但机会可能已经错过
劳动法中发展最快的领域之一是隐私。工作场所的科技创新不断挑战着我们的隐私观念。电子邮件是最新的超越现有隐私法的工具。普通法无法适应电子邮件,这说明有必要采取立法行动保护员工隐私。本文探讨了可能的立法解决方案,并试图确定反映这些解决方案核心价值的程序。雇佣法中发展最快的领域之一是隐私[1]。隐私权总体上是一个年轻的概念,1890年由塞缪尔·沃伦(Samuel Warren)和即将成为最高法院大法官的路易斯·布兰代斯(Louis Brandeis)“发现”。《隐私权》的作者对世纪之交技术的“现代企业和发明”感到震惊,特别是通过新兴的大众传播领域迅速传播的信息[2]。“即时摄影和报纸事业”不仅威胁到“从屋顶上宣布[]”那些“在壁橱里低语”的东西,并破坏名誉,而且,布兰代斯和沃伦担心,会侵犯“不可侵犯的人格”的“精神”价值[2,第205页]。因此,侵犯隐私会造成名誉之外的损害,影响“对[一个人]自我的评价和他的感受”[2,第197页]。从那时起,法律学者一直在努力对“不可侵犯人格”所包含的一系列利益进行分类。Dean Prosser减少了隐私
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信