Ellen Schmidt-Devlin, Casey Espey Newmeyer, A. Ozsomer
{"title":"A Mixed Methods Approach to Investigating Glocal or Hybrid Brands","authors":"Ellen Schmidt-Devlin, Casey Espey Newmeyer, A. Ozsomer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3687802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional distinction between global and local brands is losing salience driven by globalization and digital technology. Using the paradox theory, this dissertation investigates a third option: brands that are both global and local—something paradoxical. Navigating a brand to be both global and local at the same time has been claimed to offer a successful market approach (Swoboda, Elsner, & Morschett, 2014), but it has significant challenges (Steenkamp, 2017). These challenges include managing the tensions and contradictions of being both old and new, the same and different, or a brand paradox (Brown, Kozinets & Sherry, 2003); combining global and local strategies into a true glocal strategy (Steenkamp 2017; Steenkamp and de Jong 2010). <br><br>The goal of this study is to use the foundation of prior research on global branding and international marketing strategy to build and empirically test a roadmap to help global and local brand leaders navigate the global marketplace. We employ a mixed-methods approach to develop and validate a new framework called omni-brand orientation for global brands to become locally authentic and local brands to become globally accepted. First, we identify the building blocks of local authenticity and global acceptance through qualitative interviews with 50 top managers from global and local sport brands. This qualitative research uses constructivist grounded theory (Charmaz 2006; Strauss and Corbin 1990) and theoretical sampling, a method based on the classic work of Glaser and Strauss (1967). The research included 50 interviewees (25 leaders from global brands and 25 leaders from local brands) across 24 unique organizations. <br><br>Second, we validate the framework with quantitative surveys from 259 managers from 96 different brands. The results show that global brands use local insights, learning orientation, social network, and positive affect to build local authenticity, while local brands use innovation capability, brand power, and product performance quality to gain global acceptance.","PeriodicalId":190301,"journal":{"name":"The Tenth International Conference on Engaged Management Scholarship (Archive)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Tenth International Conference on Engaged Management Scholarship (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3687802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The traditional distinction between global and local brands is losing salience driven by globalization and digital technology. Using the paradox theory, this dissertation investigates a third option: brands that are both global and local—something paradoxical. Navigating a brand to be both global and local at the same time has been claimed to offer a successful market approach (Swoboda, Elsner, & Morschett, 2014), but it has significant challenges (Steenkamp, 2017). These challenges include managing the tensions and contradictions of being both old and new, the same and different, or a brand paradox (Brown, Kozinets & Sherry, 2003); combining global and local strategies into a true glocal strategy (Steenkamp 2017; Steenkamp and de Jong 2010).
The goal of this study is to use the foundation of prior research on global branding and international marketing strategy to build and empirically test a roadmap to help global and local brand leaders navigate the global marketplace. We employ a mixed-methods approach to develop and validate a new framework called omni-brand orientation for global brands to become locally authentic and local brands to become globally accepted. First, we identify the building blocks of local authenticity and global acceptance through qualitative interviews with 50 top managers from global and local sport brands. This qualitative research uses constructivist grounded theory (Charmaz 2006; Strauss and Corbin 1990) and theoretical sampling, a method based on the classic work of Glaser and Strauss (1967). The research included 50 interviewees (25 leaders from global brands and 25 leaders from local brands) across 24 unique organizations.
Second, we validate the framework with quantitative surveys from 259 managers from 96 different brands. The results show that global brands use local insights, learning orientation, social network, and positive affect to build local authenticity, while local brands use innovation capability, brand power, and product performance quality to gain global acceptance.
在全球化和数字技术的推动下,全球品牌和本土品牌之间的传统区别正在失去显著性。利用悖论理论,本文研究了第三种选择:品牌既具有全球性又具有地方性——这是自相矛盾的。将一个品牌同时定位于全球和本土,被认为是一种成功的市场策略(Swoboda, Elsner, &Morschett, 2014),但它有显著的挑战(Steenkamp, 2017)。这些挑战包括管理新旧、相同与不同之间的紧张和矛盾,或品牌悖论(Brown, Kozinets &雪莉,2003);将全球和本地战略结合起来,形成真正的全球本地战略(Steenkamp 2017;Steenkamp and de Jong 2010)。本研究的目的是利用先前对全球品牌和国际营销策略研究的基础,建立并实证测试一个路线图,以帮助全球和本地品牌领导者在全球市场中导航。我们采用混合方法来开发和验证一个名为全品牌定位的新框架,使全球品牌成为本地正宗品牌,使本地品牌成为全球认可的品牌。首先,我们通过对来自全球和本地运动品牌的50位高管进行定性访谈,确定了本地真实性和全球接受度的构成要素。本定性研究采用了建构主义理论(Charmaz 2006;Strauss和Corbin 1990)和理论抽样,这是一种基于Glaser和Strauss(1967)经典作品的方法。该研究包括来自24个不同组织的50位受访者(25位来自全球品牌的领导者和25位来自本土品牌的领导者)。其次,我们通过对来自96个不同品牌的259位经理的定量调查来验证该框架。结果表明,全球品牌通过本土洞察、学习导向、社会网络和积极影响来构建本土真实性,而本土品牌通过创新能力、品牌力和产品性能质量来获得全球认可。