Response Time versus Utilization in Scheduler Overhead Accounting

Silviu S. Craciunas, C. Kirsch, A. Sokolova
{"title":"Response Time versus Utilization in Scheduler Overhead Accounting","authors":"Silviu S. Craciunas, C. Kirsch, A. Sokolova","doi":"10.1109/RTAS.2010.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose two complementary methods to account for scheduler overhead in the schedulability analysis of Variable Bandwidth Servers (VBS), which control process execution speed by allocating variable CPU bandwidth to processes. Scheduler overhead in VBS may be accounted for either by decreasing process execution speed to maintain CPU utilization (called response accounting), or by increasing CPU utilization to maintain process execution speed (called utilization accounting). Both methods can be combined by handling an arbitrary fraction of the total scheduler overhead with one method and the rest with the other. Distinguishing scheduler overhead due to releasing and due to suspending processes allows us to further improve our analysis by accounting for releasing overhead in a separate, virtual VBS process. Although our analysis is based on the VBS model, the general idea of response and utilization accounting may also be applied to other, related scheduling methods.","PeriodicalId":356388,"journal":{"name":"2010 16th IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 16th IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTAS.2010.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

We propose two complementary methods to account for scheduler overhead in the schedulability analysis of Variable Bandwidth Servers (VBS), which control process execution speed by allocating variable CPU bandwidth to processes. Scheduler overhead in VBS may be accounted for either by decreasing process execution speed to maintain CPU utilization (called response accounting), or by increasing CPU utilization to maintain process execution speed (called utilization accounting). Both methods can be combined by handling an arbitrary fraction of the total scheduler overhead with one method and the rest with the other. Distinguishing scheduler overhead due to releasing and due to suspending processes allows us to further improve our analysis by accounting for releasing overhead in a separate, virtual VBS process. Although our analysis is based on the VBS model, the general idea of response and utilization accounting may also be applied to other, related scheduling methods.
调度器开销会计中的响应时间与利用率
我们提出了两种互补的方法来解释可变带宽服务器(VBS)的可调度性分析中的调度器开销,它通过向进程分配可变CPU带宽来控制进程的执行速度。VBS中的调度器开销可以通过降低进程执行速度来保持CPU利用率(称为响应计费),也可以通过增加CPU利用率来保持进程执行速度(称为利用率计费)。这两种方法可以组合在一起,用一种方法处理总调度器开销的任意部分,用另一种方法处理其余部分。通过区分释放进程和挂起进程造成的调度器开销,我们可以在一个单独的虚拟VBS进程中考虑释放开销,从而进一步改进分析。虽然我们的分析是基于VBS模型,但响应和利用会计的一般思想也可以应用于其他相关的调度方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信