{"title":"PERFORMANCE OF H. PLESNER’S PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: ECCENTRIC POSITIONALITY AND THEORY OF PERSONAL SOCIALIZATION","authors":"H. Shalashenko","doi":"10.33989/2075-1443.2023.46.271519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Helmut Plesner’s philosophical anthropology introduces not only the division of the world of the living being into self and environment, but also a superstructure over the zip distribution: eccentric positionality. This reflexive ability of the self to relate to itself allows the formation of personal-relative, i.e., social life. The aim of the article is: to trace the possibilities of methodological renewal of sociotheoretical discourse, which opens for him the principle of eccentric positionality.The study uses historical-comparative and logical-analytical methods. Research results. H. Plesner in the idea of eccentric positionality unfolds the perspective and possible practical consequences of the establishment of human openness in the world, not stopping at the danger of finally breaking the anthropological framework of his philosophy, dissolving it in the concept of personal socialization.Conclusion. Plesner’s «social» is presented as a life phenomenon – it is the highest manifestation of life, and the process of personalization of life manifestations is a process of socialization. Taking the self beyond oneself in eccentric positionality is something more than separating oneself from the environment, opposing oneself to it and establishing an attitude towards it. In the course of establishing the relation to oneself, the self does not form it automatically – the positioning of eccentricity cannot be carried out directly – which enables a special space favorable for the «inter-self» existence of living beings, a specific sphere of «inter-self» relations – the sphere of social existence.","PeriodicalId":137741,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Horizons","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33989/2075-1443.2023.46.271519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Helmut Plesner’s philosophical anthropology introduces not only the division of the world of the living being into self and environment, but also a superstructure over the zip distribution: eccentric positionality. This reflexive ability of the self to relate to itself allows the formation of personal-relative, i.e., social life. The aim of the article is: to trace the possibilities of methodological renewal of sociotheoretical discourse, which opens for him the principle of eccentric positionality.The study uses historical-comparative and logical-analytical methods. Research results. H. Plesner in the idea of eccentric positionality unfolds the perspective and possible practical consequences of the establishment of human openness in the world, not stopping at the danger of finally breaking the anthropological framework of his philosophy, dissolving it in the concept of personal socialization.Conclusion. Plesner’s «social» is presented as a life phenomenon – it is the highest manifestation of life, and the process of personalization of life manifestations is a process of socialization. Taking the self beyond oneself in eccentric positionality is something more than separating oneself from the environment, opposing oneself to it and establishing an attitude towards it. In the course of establishing the relation to oneself, the self does not form it automatically – the positioning of eccentricity cannot be carried out directly – which enables a special space favorable for the «inter-self» existence of living beings, a specific sphere of «inter-self» relations – the sphere of social existence.
Helmut Plesner的哲学人类学不仅引入了生命世界的自我和环境的划分,而且还引入了zip分布之上的上层建筑:偏心位置。这种自我联系自身的反射性能力使得个人相对生活,即社会生活得以形成。本文的目的是:追踪社会理论话语方法论更新的可能性,这为他打开了古怪位置原则。本研究采用历史比较和逻辑分析方法。研究的结果。普雷斯纳在古怪位置性的观念中,展现了人类在世界上开放性的建立的前景和可能的实践后果,没有停止于最终打破其哲学的人类学框架的危险,将其消解在个人社会化的概念中。普雷斯纳的“社会”被呈现为一种生命现象——它是生命的最高表现形式,而生命表现形式的个性化过程就是社会化的过程。在古怪的位置上超越自我,不仅仅是将自己从环境中分离出来,与环境对立,并建立一种对环境的态度。在与自己建立关系的过程中,自我并不是自动形成的——偏心的定位不能直接进行——这使得一个特殊的空间有利于生物的“自我间”存在,一个“自我间”关系的特定领域——社会存在的领域。