Lider polityczny w totalitarnym i demokratycznym systemie politycznym. Pozorna opozycja?

Łukasz Scheffs
{"title":"Lider polityczny w totalitarnym i demokratycznym systemie politycznym. Pozorna opozycja?","authors":"Łukasz Scheffs","doi":"10.14746/r.2010.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In traditional authority, the legitimacy of the authority comes from tradition, in charismatic authority from the personality and individual’s leadership qualities, and in rational-legal authority from powers that are bureaucraticly and legally attached to certain positions. Totalitarianism is a system of government. The leader has power without being restricted. Moreover, the leader is responsible for the monopolization of all human activities like artistic manifestations, political and communication systems. In democracy personalization exists. The personalization hypothesis states the individual has become more prominent at the expense of parties and collective identities. The question is: Are charismatic authority in totalitarianism and personalization in democracy identical?","PeriodicalId":239502,"journal":{"name":"Refleksje. Pismo naukowe studentów i doktorantów WNPiD UAM","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Refleksje. Pismo naukowe studentów i doktorantów WNPiD UAM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/r.2010.2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In traditional authority, the legitimacy of the authority comes from tradition, in charismatic authority from the personality and individual’s leadership qualities, and in rational-legal authority from powers that are bureaucraticly and legally attached to certain positions. Totalitarianism is a system of government. The leader has power without being restricted. Moreover, the leader is responsible for the monopolization of all human activities like artistic manifestations, political and communication systems. In democracy personalization exists. The personalization hypothesis states the individual has become more prominent at the expense of parties and collective identities. The question is: Are charismatic authority in totalitarianism and personalization in democracy identical?
在传统权威中,权威的合法性来自传统,在魅力型权威中,权威的合法性来自人格和个人的领导素质,在理性-法律权威中,权威的合法性来自官僚和法律上依附于某些职位的权力。极权主义是一种政府体制。领导人的权力不受限制。此外,领导者对所有人类活动,如艺术表现形式、政治和传播系统的垄断负有责任。在民主中,人格化是存在的。个性化假设认为,个人以牺牲党派和集体身份为代价变得更加突出。问题是:极权主义中的魅力型权威和民主中的个人化是相同的吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信