Geological and Geophysical Observations to Determine the Gas Seepage Source of Titas Gas Field Region, Bangladesh

Sourov Datta Bijoy, Yousuf Gazi, S. Kabir, Badrul Imam
{"title":"Geological and Geophysical Observations to Determine the Gas Seepage Source of Titas Gas Field Region, Bangladesh","authors":"Sourov Datta Bijoy, Yousuf Gazi, S. Kabir, Badrul Imam","doi":"10.3329/jasbs.v45i1.46572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Titas Gas Field, the largest gas field in Bangladesh, has been encountering gas seepages in numerous points at the surface in an area of about 7 sq. km. at the southeastern part of the field since 2006. Gas has been seeping through the water wells, small and large holes in the fields including agricultural lands, in the river and through the cracks in the ground. The present research attempts to point out the source of the gas seepages based on the field studies, wireline log analyses and other available borehole data. A reconnaissance resistivity survey has been carried out around the high seepages area to detect any evidence of shallow subsurface fault. No fault was detected by resistivity survey in the shallow depth in the seepage area and thus fault as a conduit for the seepage could not be confirmed. Primarily, all wells of Titas Well Location (TWL-C) (Titas-06, 08, 09 and 10) were suspected as possible source wells as the surface distribution of seepages generally clusters around TWL-C. Titas-06 and Titas-08 were taken out of suspect list as the gas seepage distributions do not follow well path and cement bonding against reservoir sands including ‘A’ sand in these two wells are also good. Gas seepages follow the well trajectories of Titas-09 and 10 wells but cement bonding against ‘A’ gas sand in Titas-09 also discarded the well as a probable source of the gas seepage. Also, the suggestion that Titas well-03 could be a source of gas seep is also ruled out because of the fact that it is located 3 km away from the seepage area, there is no evidence of any seepage in between the well 3 and the seepage area, and the gas sands are also well protected. The above evidences turned the whole focus onto Titas-10. Gamma ray, resistivity, density, sonic and neutron log signatures recorded initially in the Titas-10 well strongly indicated a major gas sand and has been designated ‘A1’ gas sand. On the basis of various logs including CBL/VDL log it is evident that about 23 meters (3157-3180-meter MD) gas sand at the top which is not protected by cement. It is most likely source of gas seeps in Titas gas field is the gap in the cement protection at the top of A sand in Titas-10 well. \nAsiat. Soc. Bangladesh, Sci. 45(1): 93-109, June 2019","PeriodicalId":186946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Science","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jasbs.v45i1.46572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Titas Gas Field, the largest gas field in Bangladesh, has been encountering gas seepages in numerous points at the surface in an area of about 7 sq. km. at the southeastern part of the field since 2006. Gas has been seeping through the water wells, small and large holes in the fields including agricultural lands, in the river and through the cracks in the ground. The present research attempts to point out the source of the gas seepages based on the field studies, wireline log analyses and other available borehole data. A reconnaissance resistivity survey has been carried out around the high seepages area to detect any evidence of shallow subsurface fault. No fault was detected by resistivity survey in the shallow depth in the seepage area and thus fault as a conduit for the seepage could not be confirmed. Primarily, all wells of Titas Well Location (TWL-C) (Titas-06, 08, 09 and 10) were suspected as possible source wells as the surface distribution of seepages generally clusters around TWL-C. Titas-06 and Titas-08 were taken out of suspect list as the gas seepage distributions do not follow well path and cement bonding against reservoir sands including ‘A’ sand in these two wells are also good. Gas seepages follow the well trajectories of Titas-09 and 10 wells but cement bonding against ‘A’ gas sand in Titas-09 also discarded the well as a probable source of the gas seepage. Also, the suggestion that Titas well-03 could be a source of gas seep is also ruled out because of the fact that it is located 3 km away from the seepage area, there is no evidence of any seepage in between the well 3 and the seepage area, and the gas sands are also well protected. The above evidences turned the whole focus onto Titas-10. Gamma ray, resistivity, density, sonic and neutron log signatures recorded initially in the Titas-10 well strongly indicated a major gas sand and has been designated ‘A1’ gas sand. On the basis of various logs including CBL/VDL log it is evident that about 23 meters (3157-3180-meter MD) gas sand at the top which is not protected by cement. It is most likely source of gas seeps in Titas gas field is the gap in the cement protection at the top of A sand in Titas-10 well. Asiat. Soc. Bangladesh, Sci. 45(1): 93-109, June 2019
利用地质和地球物理观测确定孟加拉Titas气田区天然气渗流来源
Titas气田是孟加拉国最大的天然气田,在面积约7平方英尺的地面上,许多地方都出现了天然气渗漏。公里。从2006年开始在油田的东南部。天然气一直在从水井、农田里的大大小小的洞、河流和地面裂缝中渗出。本研究试图在现场研究、电缆测井分析和其他现有井眼资料的基础上,指出天然气渗漏的来源。在高渗区周围进行了电阻率勘测,以发现浅层地下断层的迹象。在渗流区浅部电阻率测量未发现断层,因此不能确定断层为渗流通道。首先,由于地表渗流分布普遍集中在TWL-C附近,推测Titas井位(TWL-C)的所有井(Titas-06、08、09和10)为可能的源井。由于Titas-06和Titas-08两口井的气体渗流分布与井眼轨迹不一致,且与储层砂(包括A砂)的水泥胶结性也较好,因此排除在可疑名单之外。天然气渗漏遵循Titas-09和10井的井眼轨迹,但Titas-09井与“A”气砂的胶结也排除了该井作为天然气渗漏可能来源的可能性。另外,由于3号井距渗漏区3公里,3号井与渗漏区之间没有任何渗漏的迹象,并且气砂也得到了很好的保护,因此也排除了3号井可能是天然气渗漏源的可能性。上述证据将整个焦点转向了Titas-10。最初在Titas-10井中记录的伽马射线、电阻率、密度、声波和中子测井特征强烈表明存在主要含气砂岩,并被命名为“A1”含气砂岩。根据包括CBL/VDL测井在内的各种测井资料,很明显,顶部约有23米(3157-3180米)的气砂没有受到水泥的保护。Titas-10井A砂顶水泥保护层缝隙是Titas气田最可能的天然气渗漏源。Asiat。Soc。中国科学,45(1):93-109,2019年6月
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信