Genre analysis of research grant proposals

H. Feng, Ling Shi
{"title":"Genre analysis of research grant proposals","authors":"H. Feng, Ling Shi","doi":"10.14288/1.0078162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines nine successful SSHRC (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada) standard research grant proposals written by nine professors in the field of education at a Canadian university. The study follows the tradition of move analysis developed by Swales (1990) and Bhatia (1993) to describe the generic structures of the summary (one page) and main text (six pages) of the sample proposals. Findings suggest a three-move scheme of the summary and a ten-move scheme of the main text. Compared with a comparatively sequential move structure in the summary, the rhetorical structure of the main text with move recurrences and move mixing appears to be quite complex. The study addresses the issues of move recurrence and move mixing by revealing the grant writers’ rationale behind their discursive act. Based on the analyses of both textual and interview data, the study also describes and explains the rhetorical strategies the writers employed in achieving the promotional purposes and addressing the reviewer committee. Implications for move analysts and suggestions for grant proposal learner writers are also included.","PeriodicalId":227475,"journal":{"name":"LSP and professional communication","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSP and professional communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0078162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

This paper examines nine successful SSHRC (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada) standard research grant proposals written by nine professors in the field of education at a Canadian university. The study follows the tradition of move analysis developed by Swales (1990) and Bhatia (1993) to describe the generic structures of the summary (one page) and main text (six pages) of the sample proposals. Findings suggest a three-move scheme of the summary and a ten-move scheme of the main text. Compared with a comparatively sequential move structure in the summary, the rhetorical structure of the main text with move recurrences and move mixing appears to be quite complex. The study addresses the issues of move recurrence and move mixing by revealing the grant writers’ rationale behind their discursive act. Based on the analyses of both textual and interview data, the study also describes and explains the rhetorical strategies the writers employed in achieving the promotional purposes and addressing the reviewer committee. Implications for move analysts and suggestions for grant proposal learner writers are also included.
研究资助提案的体裁分析
本文考察了加拿大一所大学教育领域的9位教授撰写的9份成功的SSHRC(加拿大社会科学与人文研究理事会)标准研究资助提案。该研究遵循了Swales(1990)和Bhatia(1993)开发的移动分析传统,描述了样本提案的摘要(一页)和正文(六页)的一般结构。研究结果表明,摘要为三步式,正文为十步式。与摘要中较为有序的句式结构相比,主语篇中重复句式和混合句式的修辞结构显得十分复杂。该研究通过揭示授权作者话语行为背后的基本原理,解决了移动重复和移动混合的问题。基于对文本和访谈数据的分析,本研究还描述和解释了作者在实现促销目的和向审查委员会发表讲话时所采用的修辞策略。还包括对行动分析的影响和对拨款提案学习者作者的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信