A Reliability-oriented Faults Taxonomy and a Recovery-oriented Methodological Approach for Systems Resilience

Carlo Vitucci, Daniel Sundmark, Marcus Jägemar, Jakob Danielsson, Alf Larsson, Thomas Nolte
{"title":"A Reliability-oriented Faults Taxonomy and a Recovery-oriented Methodological Approach for Systems Resilience","authors":"Carlo Vitucci, Daniel Sundmark, Marcus Jägemar, Jakob Danielsson, Alf Larsson, Thomas Nolte","doi":"10.1109/COMPSAC54236.2022.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fault management is an important function that impacts the design of any digital system, from the simple kiosk in a shop to a complex 6G network. It is common to classify fault conditions into different taxonomies using terms like fault or error. Fault taxonomies are often suitable for managing fault detection, fault reporting, and fault localization but often neglect to support all different functions required by a fault management process. A correctly implemented fault management process must be able to distinguish between defects and faults, decide upon ap-propriate actions to recover the system to an ideal state, and avoid an error condition. Fault management is a multi-disciplinary process where recovery actions are deployed promptly by com-bined hardware, firmware, and software orchestration. The importance of fault management processes significantly increases with modern nanometer technologies, which suffer the risk of so-called soft errors, a corruption of a bit cells that can happen due to spurious disturbance, like cosmic radiation. Modern fault management implementations must support recovery actions for soft errors to ensure a steady system. This paper describes an extended fault classification model that emphasizes fault management and recovery actions. We aim to show how the reliability-based fault taxonomy definition is more suitable for the overall fault management process.","PeriodicalId":330838,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 46th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 46th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC54236.2022.00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Fault management is an important function that impacts the design of any digital system, from the simple kiosk in a shop to a complex 6G network. It is common to classify fault conditions into different taxonomies using terms like fault or error. Fault taxonomies are often suitable for managing fault detection, fault reporting, and fault localization but often neglect to support all different functions required by a fault management process. A correctly implemented fault management process must be able to distinguish between defects and faults, decide upon ap-propriate actions to recover the system to an ideal state, and avoid an error condition. Fault management is a multi-disciplinary process where recovery actions are deployed promptly by com-bined hardware, firmware, and software orchestration. The importance of fault management processes significantly increases with modern nanometer technologies, which suffer the risk of so-called soft errors, a corruption of a bit cells that can happen due to spurious disturbance, like cosmic radiation. Modern fault management implementations must support recovery actions for soft errors to ensure a steady system. This paper describes an extended fault classification model that emphasizes fault management and recovery actions. We aim to show how the reliability-based fault taxonomy definition is more suitable for the overall fault management process.
面向可靠性的故障分类和面向恢复的系统弹性方法
故障管理是影响任何数字系统设计的重要功能,从商店中的简单亭到复杂的6G网络。通常使用诸如故障或错误之类的术语将故障条件分类为不同的分类法。故障分类法通常适用于管理故障检测、故障报告和故障定位,但通常忽略了支持故障管理流程所需的所有不同功能。正确实现的故障管理流程必须能够区分缺陷和故障,决定适当的操作以将系统恢复到理想状态,并避免错误情况。故障管理是一个多学科的过程,通过结合硬件、固件和软件编排迅速部署恢复操作。随着现代纳米技术的发展,故障管理过程的重要性显著增加,它面临着所谓的软错误的风险,即由于虚假干扰(如宇宙辐射)可能发生的位单元损坏。现代故障管理实现必须支持软错误的恢复操作,以确保系统稳定。本文描述了一个扩展的故障分类模型,强调故障管理和恢复动作。我们的目的是展示基于可靠性的故障分类定义如何更适合整个故障管理过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信