Coalitional Game Theory for Security Risk Management

W. Saad, T. Alpcan, T. Başar, A. Hjørungnes
{"title":"Coalitional Game Theory for Security Risk Management","authors":"W. Saad, T. Alpcan, T. Başar, A. Hjørungnes","doi":"10.1109/ICIMP.2010.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantitative models for security risk management in organizations are recently receiving an increased attention in the research community. This paper investigates the possibility of cooperation among autonomous divisions of an organization with dependent security assets and/or vulnerabilities for reducing overall security risks. A coalitional game is formulated for modeling cooperation possibilities among these divisions based on their both positive (synergies) and negative (vulnerabilities) interdependencies. The proposed game constitutes a framework that allows to investigate how an organization can maximize its total utility through cooperation among its different divisions. The introduced utility accounts for the gains from cooperation, in terms of an improved synergy among the divisions, and the costs for cooperation that account for the friction among the divisions (e.g. due to social and human factors) as well as the difficulty of managing large-sized divisions. Using the proposed game model, the illustrative cases of two-coalition cooperation, two-division cooperation as well as a practical scenario when using an ideal cooperation protocol are analyzed","PeriodicalId":314947,"journal":{"name":"2010 Fifth International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Fifth International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMP.2010.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Quantitative models for security risk management in organizations are recently receiving an increased attention in the research community. This paper investigates the possibility of cooperation among autonomous divisions of an organization with dependent security assets and/or vulnerabilities for reducing overall security risks. A coalitional game is formulated for modeling cooperation possibilities among these divisions based on their both positive (synergies) and negative (vulnerabilities) interdependencies. The proposed game constitutes a framework that allows to investigate how an organization can maximize its total utility through cooperation among its different divisions. The introduced utility accounts for the gains from cooperation, in terms of an improved synergy among the divisions, and the costs for cooperation that account for the friction among the divisions (e.g. due to social and human factors) as well as the difficulty of managing large-sized divisions. Using the proposed game model, the illustrative cases of two-coalition cooperation, two-division cooperation as well as a practical scenario when using an ideal cooperation protocol are analyzed
安全风险管理的联盟博弈论
组织安全风险管理的定量模型最近在研究界受到越来越多的关注。本文研究了具有依赖安全资产和/或漏洞的组织的自治部门之间为减少整体安全风险而进行合作的可能性。基于这些部门之间的积极(协同)和消极(脆弱性)相互依赖关系,制定了一个联盟博弈来模拟它们之间的合作可能性。所提出的博弈构成了一个框架,允许研究组织如何通过不同部门之间的合作最大化其总效用。引入的效用考虑了合作的收益,即部门之间的协同作用得到改善,以及部门之间的摩擦(例如由于社会和人为因素)以及管理大型部门的困难所造成的合作成本。利用所提出的博弈模型,分析了两联盟合作、两部门合作的说明案例以及使用理想合作协议时的实际场景
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信