Invisible cuts

A. Grzybowska
{"title":"Invisible cuts","authors":"A. Grzybowska","doi":"10.4324/9780080518084-73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPsychological violence is a complex phenomenon that often goes unrecognized. Nonetheless, its effects can seriously impact one’s functioning, including understanding one’s personhood within a given culture, interacting with society, and expressing oneself within its bounds. This stems from the fact that psychological violence, in both its occurrence and its effects, is inextricably linked with meaning-making processes, interpreting the world, and responding to it. Due to its vague definition, the experience of psychological violence is vulnerable to hermeneutical injustice, which, as Miranda Fricker explains, is the effect of a gap in collective interpretative resources and the resulting disadvantage in making sense of one’s reality. Considering culture’s significant impact on conceptualizing psychological violence, this article focuses on its representations in two contemporary sf films, which will be studied for their contribution to hermeneutical (in)justice: Tau (2018) and Upstream Color (2013). The first part delineates the term’s general meaning and how it is applied to this analysis. The second part explores the transmutations of personhood induced by psychological violence in Tau, along with the dialectic between the cultural code of agency and the position of the “victim.” In the third part, the dynamic of psychological violence is recognized as the main driving force for the narrative in Upstream Color, a movie that is interpreted as a spectacle of the woman’s psychological degradation. Finally, the article reflects upon how engaging with these films can either raise or degrade our competence in dealing with the violation of human psyche.","PeriodicalId":276686,"journal":{"name":"Science Fiction Film & Television","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Fiction Film & Television","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080518084-73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychological violence is a complex phenomenon that often goes unrecognized. Nonetheless, its effects can seriously impact one’s functioning, including understanding one’s personhood within a given culture, interacting with society, and expressing oneself within its bounds. This stems from the fact that psychological violence, in both its occurrence and its effects, is inextricably linked with meaning-making processes, interpreting the world, and responding to it. Due to its vague definition, the experience of psychological violence is vulnerable to hermeneutical injustice, which, as Miranda Fricker explains, is the effect of a gap in collective interpretative resources and the resulting disadvantage in making sense of one’s reality. Considering culture’s significant impact on conceptualizing psychological violence, this article focuses on its representations in two contemporary sf films, which will be studied for their contribution to hermeneutical (in)justice: Tau (2018) and Upstream Color (2013). The first part delineates the term’s general meaning and how it is applied to this analysis. The second part explores the transmutations of personhood induced by psychological violence in Tau, along with the dialectic between the cultural code of agency and the position of the “victim.” In the third part, the dynamic of psychological violence is recognized as the main driving force for the narrative in Upstream Color, a movie that is interpreted as a spectacle of the woman’s psychological degradation. Finally, the article reflects upon how engaging with these films can either raise or degrade our competence in dealing with the violation of human psyche.
看不见的削减
心理暴力是一种经常被忽视的复杂现象。然而,它的影响会严重影响一个人的功能,包括在特定文化中理解一个人的人格,与社会互动,以及在其范围内表达自己。这源于这样一个事实,即心理暴力,无论是其发生还是其影响,都与意义创造过程、对世界的解释和对世界的反应有着密不可分的联系。由于其定义模糊,心理暴力的经历容易受到解释学上的不公正的影响,正如米兰达·弗里克(Miranda Fricker)所解释的那样,这是集体解释资源的差距和由此导致的对现实的理解的不利影响。考虑到文化对心理暴力概念化的重要影响,本文将重点关注其在两部当代科幻电影中的表现,并研究它们对解释学正义的贡献:Tau(2018)和Upstream Color(2013)。第一部分描述了该术语的一般含义以及如何将其应用于本分析。第二部分探讨了心理暴力导致的Tau人的人格嬗变,以及代理的文化规范与“受害者”地位之间的辩证关系。第三部分认为,心理暴力的动力是《上游色彩》叙事的主要动力,这部电影被解读为一场女性心理堕落的奇观。最后,本文反思了与这些电影的接触如何提高或降低我们处理人类心灵侵犯的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信