Pre-Funded and Internally Funded Pension Plans: The Potential for Improving Global Comparability

Mark LaMonte
{"title":"Pre-Funded and Internally Funded Pension Plans: The Potential for Improving Global Comparability","authors":"Mark LaMonte","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.978536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this special comment, we discuss some of the analytical advantages and disadvantages of incorporating information about pension assets and liabilities for pre-funded and internally funded pension plans into key ratios. Moody's already has well-established methodologies in place for the analysis of both types of pension plans. These methodologies, which consider the debt-like nature of pension obligations regardless of how they are funded, introduce financial statement adjustments that result in broad comparability between companies with either type of pension plan. Moody's also seeks to improve comparability further by considering supplemental ratios that adjust for pension assets and obligations on a gross basis. The supplemental ratios are used as an enhancement to our existing methodologies and provide an alternative perspective in our analysis of pension obligations. They help us to identify outliers not evident under our existing practices and that may require further scrutiny. The purpose of this special comment is to present the supplemental ratios that we use in our analysis and to provide an overview of Moody's existing methodologies for pension plans.","PeriodicalId":432647,"journal":{"name":"Logic & Philosophy of Mathematics eJournal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logic & Philosophy of Mathematics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.978536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this special comment, we discuss some of the analytical advantages and disadvantages of incorporating information about pension assets and liabilities for pre-funded and internally funded pension plans into key ratios. Moody's already has well-established methodologies in place for the analysis of both types of pension plans. These methodologies, which consider the debt-like nature of pension obligations regardless of how they are funded, introduce financial statement adjustments that result in broad comparability between companies with either type of pension plan. Moody's also seeks to improve comparability further by considering supplemental ratios that adjust for pension assets and obligations on a gross basis. The supplemental ratios are used as an enhancement to our existing methodologies and provide an alternative perspective in our analysis of pension obligations. They help us to identify outliers not evident under our existing practices and that may require further scrutiny. The purpose of this special comment is to present the supplemental ratios that we use in our analysis and to provide an overview of Moody's existing methodologies for pension plans.
预先供资和内部供资养老金计划:提高全球可比性的潜力
在这篇特别评论中,我们将讨论将有关预先供资和内部供资的养老金计划的养老金资产和负债信息纳入关键比率的一些分析性优点和缺点。穆迪已经有一套完善的方法来分析这两种养老金计划。这些方法考虑了养老金义务的类似债务性质,而不管它们是如何融资的,它们引入了财务报表调整,从而使拥有两种养老金计划的公司之间具有广泛的可比性。穆迪还寻求进一步提高可比性,考虑在毛额基础上调整养老金资产和债务的补充比率。补充比率用于加强我们现有的方法,并为我们分析养恤金义务提供了另一种视角。它们帮助我们识别在现有实践中不明显的异常值,这可能需要进一步的审查。本特别评论的目的是介绍我们在分析中使用的补充比率,并概述穆迪现有的养老金计划方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信