DISTINCTION OF MINIMIZATION (OPTIMIZATION) OF TAXES FROM PREDICATE CRIMINAL OFFENCES IN THE TAXATION SYSTEM OF UKRAINE

V. L. Honcharuk
{"title":"DISTINCTION OF MINIMIZATION (OPTIMIZATION) OF TAXES FROM PREDICATE CRIMINAL OFFENCES IN THE TAXATION SYSTEM OF UKRAINE","authors":"V. L. Honcharuk","doi":"10.15421/012185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article argues the expediency of considering the issue of distinguishing lawful conduct from predicate criminal offenses of evasion of legal obligations in the taxation system of Ukraine, which are committed in the framework of lawful economic activity. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the state’s economy can be negatively affected by acts committed in a manner not prohibited by law and are determined through the category of “minimization (optimization) of taxes”. It is argued that evasion and optimization on the basis of conscious and purposeful action coincide with the goal – to reduce the tax liability, and at the same time when evading a person consciously finds a way to achieve the goal for which there is a direct rule of criminal prohibition and wants socially dangerous consequences. Scientific provisions on the subjective side of a person’s behavior in reducing the tax burden by selected groups of methods and techniques of tax planning are revealed. There is emphasized the author`s approach for distinguishing features of underlined previously groups and methods by the subjective side of activity. The purpose of the study is to develop an author’s scientific approach to the separation of minimization (optimization) of taxes from predicate criminal offenses in the taxation system of Ukraine. It is concluded that when comparing groups of methods and ways to reduce the payment of tax liabilities should be borne in mind that it is the intent embodies the awareness of the actual nature of actions and awareness of their social significance, i.e. the degree of harmful effects on public relations. According to the intellectual component of intent in the commission of illegal acts, awareness of the public danger of the perpetrator occurs indirectly through the understanding of the public danger of acts of non-performance or improper performance of their legal duty. According to the volitional component of intent, its subject is not only socially dangerous actions, but also the corresponding negative consequences caused by them. The expression of will to use legal and illegal methods and means to achieve the goal of reducing the tax burden are purposeful, but different in nature. When qualifying actions aimed at reducing the tax burden should be borne in mind that certain expressions of will are causally related to mental processes occurring in her mind, and therefore the separation of minimization (optimization) of taxes from predicate criminal offenses in the taxation system of Ukraine a sign of the subjective side.","PeriodicalId":228288,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15421/012185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article argues the expediency of considering the issue of distinguishing lawful conduct from predicate criminal offenses of evasion of legal obligations in the taxation system of Ukraine, which are committed in the framework of lawful economic activity. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the state’s economy can be negatively affected by acts committed in a manner not prohibited by law and are determined through the category of “minimization (optimization) of taxes”. It is argued that evasion and optimization on the basis of conscious and purposeful action coincide with the goal – to reduce the tax liability, and at the same time when evading a person consciously finds a way to achieve the goal for which there is a direct rule of criminal prohibition and wants socially dangerous consequences. Scientific provisions on the subjective side of a person’s behavior in reducing the tax burden by selected groups of methods and techniques of tax planning are revealed. There is emphasized the author`s approach for distinguishing features of underlined previously groups and methods by the subjective side of activity. The purpose of the study is to develop an author’s scientific approach to the separation of minimization (optimization) of taxes from predicate criminal offenses in the taxation system of Ukraine. It is concluded that when comparing groups of methods and ways to reduce the payment of tax liabilities should be borne in mind that it is the intent embodies the awareness of the actual nature of actions and awareness of their social significance, i.e. the degree of harmful effects on public relations. According to the intellectual component of intent in the commission of illegal acts, awareness of the public danger of the perpetrator occurs indirectly through the understanding of the public danger of acts of non-performance or improper performance of their legal duty. According to the volitional component of intent, its subject is not only socially dangerous actions, but also the corresponding negative consequences caused by them. The expression of will to use legal and illegal methods and means to achieve the goal of reducing the tax burden are purposeful, but different in nature. When qualifying actions aimed at reducing the tax burden should be borne in mind that certain expressions of will are causally related to mental processes occurring in her mind, and therefore the separation of minimization (optimization) of taxes from predicate criminal offenses in the taxation system of Ukraine a sign of the subjective side.
乌克兰税收制度中税收最小化(优化)与上游刑事犯罪的区别
本文认为,考虑区分合法行为与乌克兰税收制度中逃避法律义务的上游刑事犯罪问题的权宜之计,这是在合法经济活动的框架内实施的。强调的事实是,以法律不禁止的方式实施的行为可能对国家经济产生负面影响,这些行为是通过“税收最小化(优化)”类别确定的。本文认为,以自觉和有目的的行为为基础的逃避和优化,与减少纳税义务的目标是一致的,同时,一个人在有意识地逃避时,也找到了一种实现目标的方式,这种目标有直接的刑事禁止规则,并希望产生社会危险后果。通过对税收筹划方法和技巧的选择,揭示了个人行为在减轻税负方面的主观方面的科学规定。强调了作者通过活动的主观方面来区分先前强调的群体和方法的特征的方法。该研究的目的是开发一个作者的科学方法,以最大限度地分离(优化)税收从上游刑事犯罪在乌克兰的税收制度。综上所述,在比较群体减少纳税义务的方法和途径时应牢记的是,它的意图体现了对行为的实际性质的认识和对其社会意义的认识,即对公共关系的有害影响程度。根据违法行为故意的智力构成,行为人对公共危险的认识是通过对不履行或不当履行法律义务行为的公共危险的认识而间接发生的。根据故意的意志成分,其主体不仅是具有社会危险性的行为,还包括由此产生的相应的消极后果。意志的表达使用合法和非法的方法和手段来达到减轻税负的目的是有目的性的,但性质不同。当旨在减轻税收负担的限定行动时,应记住,某些意志的表达与她脑海中发生的心理过程有因果关系,因此,在乌克兰的税收制度中,税收最小化(优化)与上游刑事犯罪的分离是主观方面的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信