A Comparative Study of COVID-19 CT Image Synthesis using GAN and CycleGAN

Kin Wai Lee, R. Chin
{"title":"A Comparative Study of COVID-19 CT Image Synthesis using GAN and CycleGAN","authors":"Kin Wai Lee, R. Chin","doi":"10.1109/IICAIET55139.2022.9936810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generative adversarial networks (GANs) have been very successful in many applications of medical image synthesis, which hold great clinical value in diagnosis and analysis tasks, especially when data is scarce. This study compares the two most adopted generative modelling algorithms in recent medical image synthesis tasks, namely the traditional Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) and Cycle-consistency Generative Adversarial Network (CycleGAN) for COVID-19 CT image synthesis. Experiments show that very plausible synthetic COVID-19 images with a clear vision of artificially generated ground glass opacity (GGO) can be generated with CycleGAN when trained using an identity loss constant at 0.5. Moreover, it is found that the synthesis of the synthetic GGO features is generalized across images with different chest and lung structures, which suggests that diverse patterns of GGO can be synthesized using a conventional Image-to- Image translation setting without additional auxiliary conditions or visual annotations. In addition, similar experiment setting achieves encouraging perceptual quality with a Fréchet Inception Distance score of 0.347, which outperforms GAN at 0.383 and CycleGAN at 0.380 with an identity loss constant of 0.005. The experiment outcomes postulate a negative correlation between the strength of the identity loss and the significance of the synthetic instances manifested on the generated images, which highlights an interesting research path to improve the quality of generated images without compromising the significance of synthetic instances upon the image translation.","PeriodicalId":142482,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IICAIET55139.2022.9936810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative adversarial networks (GANs) have been very successful in many applications of medical image synthesis, which hold great clinical value in diagnosis and analysis tasks, especially when data is scarce. This study compares the two most adopted generative modelling algorithms in recent medical image synthesis tasks, namely the traditional Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) and Cycle-consistency Generative Adversarial Network (CycleGAN) for COVID-19 CT image synthesis. Experiments show that very plausible synthetic COVID-19 images with a clear vision of artificially generated ground glass opacity (GGO) can be generated with CycleGAN when trained using an identity loss constant at 0.5. Moreover, it is found that the synthesis of the synthetic GGO features is generalized across images with different chest and lung structures, which suggests that diverse patterns of GGO can be synthesized using a conventional Image-to- Image translation setting without additional auxiliary conditions or visual annotations. In addition, similar experiment setting achieves encouraging perceptual quality with a Fréchet Inception Distance score of 0.347, which outperforms GAN at 0.383 and CycleGAN at 0.380 with an identity loss constant of 0.005. The experiment outcomes postulate a negative correlation between the strength of the identity loss and the significance of the synthetic instances manifested on the generated images, which highlights an interesting research path to improve the quality of generated images without compromising the significance of synthetic instances upon the image translation.
GAN与CycleGAN合成COVID-19 CT图像的比较研究
生成对抗网络(GANs)在医学图像合成的许多应用中取得了成功,在诊断和分析任务中具有重要的临床价值,特别是在数据稀缺的情况下。本研究比较了最近医学图像合成任务中采用最多的两种生成建模算法,即传统的生成对抗网络(GAN)和循环一致性生成对抗网络(CycleGAN)用于COVID-19 CT图像合成。实验表明,当使用0.5的身份损失常数进行训练时,CycleGAN可以生成非常逼真的合成COVID-19图像,并且具有人工生成的磨砂玻璃不透明度(GGO)的清晰视觉。此外,研究发现,合成的GGO特征的合成在不同胸肺结构的图像中是通用的,这表明使用传统的图像到图像的翻译设置可以合成不同的GGO模式,而不需要额外的辅助条件或视觉注释。此外,类似的实验设置获得了令人鼓舞的感知质量,其fr起始距离得分为0.347,优于GAN的0.383和CycleGAN的0.380,身份损失常数为0.005。实验结果假设身份损失的强度与合成实例在生成图像上表现的重要性呈负相关,这突出了一个有趣的研究路径,即在不影响合成实例对图像翻译的重要性的情况下提高生成图像的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信