The influence of CPS(CEO Pay Slice) on Cost Stickiness: Focused on the Difference Depending on the Type of CEO

Seung Hyun Lee
{"title":"The influence of CPS(CEO Pay Slice) on Cost Stickiness: Focused on the Difference Depending on the Type of CEO","authors":"Seung Hyun Lee","doi":"10.38115/asgba.2023.20.4.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes the influence of CPS on cost stickiness. Also it analyzes whether the influences are different by the type of CEO(whether the CEO is a owner manager or a professional manger). \nFor this purpose, it collects samples from Korean companies which were listed in Korean Stock Exchange from 2013 to 2021. From the analysis using total samples, there was no significant relation between CPS and cost stickiness of SG&A. Then, this study divided the sample by owner managers’ companies and professional managers’ companies. From the analysis using owner managers’ companies, it was found that CPS was weakening the cost stickiness of SG&A. On the other hand, from the analysis using professional managers’ companies, it was found that CPS was strengthening the cost stickiness of SG&A. \nThe results of this study suggests that agency cost should be considered prior to CPS on the issue related to cost stickiness, Also, it seems that CPS strengthens the effect of the agency cost to the cost stickiness. Finally, the result of this study suggests that the direction of the impact on the company may vary depending on the type of CEO even if they are in similar level of CPS.","PeriodicalId":393783,"journal":{"name":"The Academic Society of Global Business Administration","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Academic Society of Global Business Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38115/asgba.2023.20.4.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzes the influence of CPS on cost stickiness. Also it analyzes whether the influences are different by the type of CEO(whether the CEO is a owner manager or a professional manger). For this purpose, it collects samples from Korean companies which were listed in Korean Stock Exchange from 2013 to 2021. From the analysis using total samples, there was no significant relation between CPS and cost stickiness of SG&A. Then, this study divided the sample by owner managers’ companies and professional managers’ companies. From the analysis using owner managers’ companies, it was found that CPS was weakening the cost stickiness of SG&A. On the other hand, from the analysis using professional managers’ companies, it was found that CPS was strengthening the cost stickiness of SG&A. The results of this study suggests that agency cost should be considered prior to CPS on the issue related to cost stickiness, Also, it seems that CPS strengthens the effect of the agency cost to the cost stickiness. Finally, the result of this study suggests that the direction of the impact on the company may vary depending on the type of CEO even if they are in similar level of CPS.
CEO薪酬水平对成本粘性的影响:以不同CEO类型的差异为重点
本研究分析了CPS对成本粘性的影响。并分析了CEO的类型(CEO是所有者型经理人还是职业经理人)对企业绩效的影响是否不同。为此,该研究以2013年至2021年在韩国证券交易所上市的韩国公司为样本。从使用总样本的分析来看,CPS与SG&A的成本粘性之间没有显著的关系。然后,本研究将样本按所有者经理公司和职业经理公司进行划分。通过对所有者经理公司的分析发现,CPS正在削弱SG&A的成本粘性。另一方面,通过对职业经理人公司的分析发现,CPS强化了SG&A的成本粘性。研究结果表明,在成本粘性问题上,代理成本应优先于CPS考虑,而且CPS似乎强化了代理成本对成本粘性的影响。最后,本研究的结果表明,即使处于相似的CPS水平,对公司的影响方向也可能因CEO类型而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信