Impact of true or false lumen renal perfusion after type B aortic dissection on renal volume.

N. Tsilimparis, C. Prendes, F. Heidemann, R. Jacobi, F. Rohlffs, S. Debus, K. Spanos, T. Kölbel
{"title":"Impact of true or false lumen renal perfusion after type B aortic dissection on renal volume.","authors":"N. Tsilimparis, C. Prendes, F. Heidemann, R. Jacobi, F. Rohlffs, S. Debus, K. Spanos, T. Kölbel","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.21.12203-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe aim of this study was to analyse the influence of true, false, and combined lumen perfusion of renal arteries on mid- and long-term kidney volume in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD).\n\n\nMETHODS\nRetrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with a TBAD between 2008 and 2015 in a single high-volume European center. The origin of the renal arteries was evaluated on a dedicated 3D workstation (TeraRecon Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA) and coded as either arising from the true lumen (TL), false lumen (FL) or from a combination of both (CL). Additional evaluated anatomical parameters were renal volume, length, width, and depth of the kidneys. Measurements were recorded at the time of diagnosis (T0) and at 1-month (T1), 6-months (T2), 18-months (T3) and 36-month of follow-up time (T4).\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 131 renal arteries and kidneys were evaluated in 69 patients. Mean age was 64±13 years and 77% were male. The absolute number and percentage of assessed renal arteries/kidneys was 131 (100%) at T0, 89 (68%) at T1, 73 (56%) at T2, 57 (44%) at T3 and 43 (44%) at T4. At the time of diagnosis, 71.6% renal arteries originated from the TL, 19.1% from the FL and 9.2% from a CL. TEVAR was performed in 92.7% patients and nine patients had additional renal artery stenting. At T0 the mean renal volume was 212.1±70.9cm3, 178±61.2 in women versus 222.2±70.6 in men (P=0.002). Forty-three percent of the patients had a renal volume reduction ≥15% from T0 to their last available CTA. Mixed model analysis showed a significant overall renal volume reduction of 13.7cm3 from T0 to T4 (P<0.05). No significant differences in renal-volume reduction were observed depending on origin of the renal artery, though an estimated reduction of renal volume from T0 to T4 of 40.8 cm3 was seen when the kidneys were perfused by a CL, while TL perfusion only caused a reduction of 15.6 cm3 and no relevant volume change over time was observed when the renal artery originated from FL. Alongside a renal volume reduction, mixed model analysis also showed a significant serum-creatinine increase, from 0.8618mg/at T0 to 1.38±0.56 mg/dL at T4 (P<0.001), as well as a significant glomerular filtration rate reduction over time, from > 60mL/min at T0 to 49±13 mL/min at T4 (P<0.001). A negative correlation was observed between creatinine values and renal volume change, while a positive correlation was observed between GFR and renal volume change (P<0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThere is a significant mid-term renal-volume reduction in patients with TBAD, independent of the origin of the renal arteries. Albeit not statistically significant, combined renal artery perfusion may lead to a greater volume reduction, potentially secondary to a relevant dynamic compression by the dissection membrane. Further multicentre studies are warranted to determine the effect on long-term renal function and on possible preventive strategies.","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.21.12203-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of true, false, and combined lumen perfusion of renal arteries on mid- and long-term kidney volume in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD). METHODS Retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with a TBAD between 2008 and 2015 in a single high-volume European center. The origin of the renal arteries was evaluated on a dedicated 3D workstation (TeraRecon Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA) and coded as either arising from the true lumen (TL), false lumen (FL) or from a combination of both (CL). Additional evaluated anatomical parameters were renal volume, length, width, and depth of the kidneys. Measurements were recorded at the time of diagnosis (T0) and at 1-month (T1), 6-months (T2), 18-months (T3) and 36-month of follow-up time (T4). RESULTS A total of 131 renal arteries and kidneys were evaluated in 69 patients. Mean age was 64±13 years and 77% were male. The absolute number and percentage of assessed renal arteries/kidneys was 131 (100%) at T0, 89 (68%) at T1, 73 (56%) at T2, 57 (44%) at T3 and 43 (44%) at T4. At the time of diagnosis, 71.6% renal arteries originated from the TL, 19.1% from the FL and 9.2% from a CL. TEVAR was performed in 92.7% patients and nine patients had additional renal artery stenting. At T0 the mean renal volume was 212.1±70.9cm3, 178±61.2 in women versus 222.2±70.6 in men (P=0.002). Forty-three percent of the patients had a renal volume reduction ≥15% from T0 to their last available CTA. Mixed model analysis showed a significant overall renal volume reduction of 13.7cm3 from T0 to T4 (P<0.05). No significant differences in renal-volume reduction were observed depending on origin of the renal artery, though an estimated reduction of renal volume from T0 to T4 of 40.8 cm3 was seen when the kidneys were perfused by a CL, while TL perfusion only caused a reduction of 15.6 cm3 and no relevant volume change over time was observed when the renal artery originated from FL. Alongside a renal volume reduction, mixed model analysis also showed a significant serum-creatinine increase, from 0.8618mg/at T0 to 1.38±0.56 mg/dL at T4 (P<0.001), as well as a significant glomerular filtration rate reduction over time, from > 60mL/min at T0 to 49±13 mL/min at T4 (P<0.001). A negative correlation was observed between creatinine values and renal volume change, while a positive correlation was observed between GFR and renal volume change (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS There is a significant mid-term renal-volume reduction in patients with TBAD, independent of the origin of the renal arteries. Albeit not statistically significant, combined renal artery perfusion may lead to a greater volume reduction, potentially secondary to a relevant dynamic compression by the dissection membrane. Further multicentre studies are warranted to determine the effect on long-term renal function and on possible preventive strategies.
B型主动脉夹层后真腔或假腔肾灌注对肾容积的影响。
背景:本研究的目的是分析肾动脉真腔灌注、假腔灌注和联合腔灌注对B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)患者中长期肾容量的影响。方法回顾性分析2008年至2015年欧洲单个大容量中心诊断为TBAD的患者。在专用的3D工作站(TeraRecon Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA)上评估肾动脉的起源,并将其编码为由真管腔(TL)、假管腔(FL)或两者的结合(CL)引起。另外评估的解剖学参数是肾脏的体积、长度、宽度和深度。记录诊断时(T0)、随访1个月(T1)、6个月(T2)、18个月(T3)和36个月(T4)的测量结果。结果69例患者共131条肾动脉和肾脏进行了tsa检查。平均年龄64±13岁,男性占77%。T0时评估的肾动脉/肾脏绝对数目和百分比为131 (100%),T1时为89 (68%),T2时为73 (56%),T3时为57 (44%),T4时为43(44%)。在诊断时,71.6%的肾动脉起源于左肾,19.1%起源于左肾,9.2%起源于左肾。92.7%的患者接受了TEVAR, 9例患者接受了额外的肾动脉支架术。T0时平均肾容积为212.1±70.9cm3,女性为178±61.2 cm3,男性为222.2±70.6 cm3 (P=0.002)。从T0到最后一次可用的CTA, 43%的患者肾容量减少≥15%。混合模型分析显示,从T0到T4,肾脏总容积显著减少13.7cm3 (T0时为60mL/min, T4时为49±13 mL/min, P<0.001)。肌酐值与肾容积变化呈负相关,GFR值与肾容积变化呈正相关(P<0.001)。结论TBAD患者中期肾容量明显减少,与肾动脉来源无关。虽然没有统计学意义,但联合肾动脉灌注可能导致更大的体积减少,可能继发于解剖膜的相关动态压缩。需要进一步的多中心研究来确定对长期肾功能的影响和可能的预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信