Interest Pressures and Carbon Taxation: Evidence from Vietnam

K. Vrolijk
{"title":"Interest Pressures and Carbon Taxation: Evidence from Vietnam","authors":"K. Vrolijk","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3770144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many economies implement carbon taxation to reduce emissions, but some groups may influence government to change policy in their favour. How influential are these interest pressures? This paper proposes a new methodology to measure interest pressures, merging insights from preference, expenditure, lobbying cost, and corruption data with newly collected data on public and private pressures from Vietnam. I show that interest pressures can largely account for observed changes in carbon taxation and that government adopted inefficient carbon taxation as a result of those interest pressures. The findings highlight the necessity for efficient representative institutions, which allows firms (through associations) and households (residential groups) to lobby government and receive information about the policy. Results also submit that absent lobbying regulation, firms and other interest groups resort to informal linkages to influence government, suggesting the essence of improving regulation to promote transparency and equity in lobbying among interest groups. Lastly, results suggest that policy interdependencies matter and that governments may implement carbon taxation inefficiently if it cannot sufficiently address economic constraints resulting from other policies.","PeriodicalId":424970,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Markets Economics: Industrial Policy & Regulation eJournal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Markets Economics: Industrial Policy & Regulation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3770144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many economies implement carbon taxation to reduce emissions, but some groups may influence government to change policy in their favour. How influential are these interest pressures? This paper proposes a new methodology to measure interest pressures, merging insights from preference, expenditure, lobbying cost, and corruption data with newly collected data on public and private pressures from Vietnam. I show that interest pressures can largely account for observed changes in carbon taxation and that government adopted inefficient carbon taxation as a result of those interest pressures. The findings highlight the necessity for efficient representative institutions, which allows firms (through associations) and households (residential groups) to lobby government and receive information about the policy. Results also submit that absent lobbying regulation, firms and other interest groups resort to informal linkages to influence government, suggesting the essence of improving regulation to promote transparency and equity in lobbying among interest groups. Lastly, results suggest that policy interdependencies matter and that governments may implement carbon taxation inefficiently if it cannot sufficiently address economic constraints resulting from other policies.
利益压力与碳税:来自越南的证据
许多经济体实施碳税以减少排放,但一些团体可能会影响政府,使政策朝着有利于他们的方向改变。这些利益压力的影响有多大?本文提出了一种衡量利益压力的新方法,将来自偏好、支出、游说成本和腐败数据的见解与最新收集的越南公共和私人压力数据相结合。我表明,利益压力可以在很大程度上解释观察到的碳税变化,政府采用低效的碳税是这些利益压力的结果。研究结果强调了建立有效的代表机构的必要性,这种机构允许企业(通过协会)和家庭(居民团体)游说政府并获得有关政策的信息。结果还表明,如果没有游说监管,公司和其他利益集团就会利用非正式联系来影响政府,这表明改善监管的实质是促进利益集团之间游说的透明度和公平性。最后,研究结果表明,政策相互依赖性很重要,如果碳税不能充分解决其他政策造成的经济约束,政府可能会低效地实施碳税。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信