Investigating Novel Proximity Monitoring Techniques Using Ubiquitous Sensor Technology

Seanna Adam, B. Coward, Grayson DeBerry, Caroline Glazier, Evan Magnusson, M. Boukhechba
{"title":"Investigating Novel Proximity Monitoring Techniques Using Ubiquitous Sensor Technology","authors":"Seanna Adam, B. Coward, Grayson DeBerry, Caroline Glazier, Evan Magnusson, M. Boukhechba","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this work is to investigate novel proximity detection techniques by researching and testing various sensor technologies and investigate their feasibility in an athletic context. COVID-19 has challenged sports teams to come up with reasonable and easy-to-implement solutions to provide a safe training environment for their players and staff. For this reason, proximity data is more important than ever, as many teams are in need of a way to measure social distancing and maintain contact tracing of their athletes. Bluetooth has been widely used to detect colocation and monitor social distancing. However, there are many other sensing technologies that may prove to be more accurate, robust, and secure. Therefore, the focus of this work is to investigate how Bluetooth compares with ultra-wideband and ultrasound technologies when monitoring the distance between users. We have implemented and compared the three modalities in a controlled experiment to investigate their accuracy at detecting distance between users at various levels. Our results indicate that the UWB signals are the most accurate at monitoring co-location.This is in-line with previous research suggesting that Bluetooth cannot accurately measure the distance between fast moving objects and needs about 20 seconds to stabilize distance measurements; therefore, it is not feasible to use for sports. In addition, we recorded that UWB models yielded an accuracy of over 95%, while ultrasound correctly classified the observations over 80% of the time, and Bluetooth had an accuracy of less than 50% when predicting if a given signal is within 6 feet or not.","PeriodicalId":426747,"journal":{"name":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The goal of this work is to investigate novel proximity detection techniques by researching and testing various sensor technologies and investigate their feasibility in an athletic context. COVID-19 has challenged sports teams to come up with reasonable and easy-to-implement solutions to provide a safe training environment for their players and staff. For this reason, proximity data is more important than ever, as many teams are in need of a way to measure social distancing and maintain contact tracing of their athletes. Bluetooth has been widely used to detect colocation and monitor social distancing. However, there are many other sensing technologies that may prove to be more accurate, robust, and secure. Therefore, the focus of this work is to investigate how Bluetooth compares with ultra-wideband and ultrasound technologies when monitoring the distance between users. We have implemented and compared the three modalities in a controlled experiment to investigate their accuracy at detecting distance between users at various levels. Our results indicate that the UWB signals are the most accurate at monitoring co-location.This is in-line with previous research suggesting that Bluetooth cannot accurately measure the distance between fast moving objects and needs about 20 seconds to stabilize distance measurements; therefore, it is not feasible to use for sports. In addition, we recorded that UWB models yielded an accuracy of over 95%, while ultrasound correctly classified the observations over 80% of the time, and Bluetooth had an accuracy of less than 50% when predicting if a given signal is within 6 feet or not.
利用泛在传感器技术研究新型接近监测技术
这项工作的目标是通过研究和测试各种传感器技术来研究新的接近检测技术,并研究它们在运动环境中的可行性。2019冠状病毒病给运动队提出了挑战,要求他们提出合理且易于实施的解决方案,为球员和工作人员提供安全的训练环境。因此,距离数据比以往任何时候都更加重要,因为许多球队都需要一种测量社交距离的方法,并保持对运动员的接触追踪。蓝牙已被广泛用于检测主机位置和监测社交距离。然而,还有许多其他传感技术可能被证明更准确、更健壮和更安全。因此,本研究的重点是研究在监测用户之间的距离时,蓝牙与超宽带和超声波技术的比较。我们在一个对照实验中实施并比较了这三种模式,以研究它们在检测不同级别用户之间距离时的准确性。我们的研究结果表明,超宽带信号是最准确的监测共定位。这与之前的研究一致,即蓝牙无法准确测量快速移动物体之间的距离,需要大约20秒来稳定距离测量;因此,它不适合用于体育运动。此外,我们还记录到,超宽带模型的准确率超过95%,而超声波对观察结果的准确率超过80%,而蓝牙在预测给定信号是否在6英尺内时的准确率不到50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信