Detection of stem cells in human endometrium: immune-histochemical study

Sameeah Mejbel Hamad
{"title":"Detection of stem cells in human endometrium: immune-histochemical study","authors":"Sameeah Mejbel Hamad","doi":"10.47108/jidhealth.vol5.iss2.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we recruited CD105 and CD90 markers to identify the endometrial stem cells (EnSCs) in the human uterine endometrium. Fifty endometrial specimens have been extracted from twenty-five deceased women. All specimens have been embedded in paraffin block and prepared for immune-histochemical processing. The expression of CD105 and CD90 was counted per high power field (HPF). Paired sample t-test was used to compare the means between groups and age variables. The Statistical analysis was conducted using “SPSS16 software\" The statistical significance was considered at less than 0.05. Results of paired sample t-test showed that the expression count (EC) at the Basalis layer (with CD105) was 5.26 points higher than the Functionalis layer (95% CI [3.43, 7.09]) and the correlation was strongly and positively related (r = 0.829, P < 0.001). The EC at Basalis layer (with CD90) was 4.96 points higher than Functionalis layer (95% CI [3.02, 6.89]) and the correlation was strongly and positively related (r = 0.746, P= < 0.001). The EC at Functionalis layer (with CD105) was 0.9 points higher than the Stroma layer (95% CI [2.27, 4.11]); however, the correlation was weak and positively related (r = 0.429, P = 0.032). The EC at Functionalis layer (with CD90) was 1.4 points higher than the Stroma layer (95% CI [2.1, 4.2]), but the correlation was moderately and positively related r = 0.547, P = 0.005). Findings of an independent-sample t-test showed that the EC of stem cells at the Functionalis, Basalis, and Stroma layers (with CD105 and CD90 markers) was more among patients of reproductive age (<50 years) than patients who were at non-reproductive age (50 years and above), a statistically significant difference [(m = 9.6, 95% CI (5.3, 14.6), t (19.630) = 4.413, P  < 0.001)], [(m = 10.2, 95% CI (5.2, 15.2), t (20.714) = 4.202, P  < 0.001)] and [(m = 8.4, 95% CI (3.5, 13.4), t (12.313) = 3.523, P  = 0.002)], respectively. In conclusion, the EC of the stem cells in the endometrium decreases with age.","PeriodicalId":365684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ideas in Health","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ideas in Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47108/jidhealth.vol5.iss2.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this work, we recruited CD105 and CD90 markers to identify the endometrial stem cells (EnSCs) in the human uterine endometrium. Fifty endometrial specimens have been extracted from twenty-five deceased women. All specimens have been embedded in paraffin block and prepared for immune-histochemical processing. The expression of CD105 and CD90 was counted per high power field (HPF). Paired sample t-test was used to compare the means between groups and age variables. The Statistical analysis was conducted using “SPSS16 software" The statistical significance was considered at less than 0.05. Results of paired sample t-test showed that the expression count (EC) at the Basalis layer (with CD105) was 5.26 points higher than the Functionalis layer (95% CI [3.43, 7.09]) and the correlation was strongly and positively related (r = 0.829, P < 0.001). The EC at Basalis layer (with CD90) was 4.96 points higher than Functionalis layer (95% CI [3.02, 6.89]) and the correlation was strongly and positively related (r = 0.746, P= < 0.001). The EC at Functionalis layer (with CD105) was 0.9 points higher than the Stroma layer (95% CI [2.27, 4.11]); however, the correlation was weak and positively related (r = 0.429, P = 0.032). The EC at Functionalis layer (with CD90) was 1.4 points higher than the Stroma layer (95% CI [2.1, 4.2]), but the correlation was moderately and positively related r = 0.547, P = 0.005). Findings of an independent-sample t-test showed that the EC of stem cells at the Functionalis, Basalis, and Stroma layers (with CD105 and CD90 markers) was more among patients of reproductive age (<50 years) than patients who were at non-reproductive age (50 years and above), a statistically significant difference [(m = 9.6, 95% CI (5.3, 14.6), t (19.630) = 4.413, P  < 0.001)], [(m = 10.2, 95% CI (5.2, 15.2), t (20.714) = 4.202, P  < 0.001)] and [(m = 8.4, 95% CI (3.5, 13.4), t (12.313) = 3.523, P  = 0.002)], respectively. In conclusion, the EC of the stem cells in the endometrium decreases with age.
人子宫内膜干细胞的检测:免疫组织化学研究
在这项工作中,我们招募了CD105和CD90标记物来鉴定人子宫内膜中的子宫内膜干细胞(EnSCs)。从25名已故妇女身上提取了50个子宫内膜标本。所有标本均包埋于石蜡块中,准备免疫组织化学处理。计算CD105和CD90的高倍场(HPF)表达量。采用配对样本t检验比较各组和年龄变量之间的均值。采用“SPSS16软件”进行统计学分析,以< 0.05为差异有统计学意义。配对样本t检验结果显示,基底层(含CD105)的表达计数(EC)比功能层高5.26点(95% CI[3.43, 7.09]),呈强正相关(r = 0.829, P < 0.001)。基底层EC (CD90)比功能层EC高4.96分(95% CI[3.02, 6.89]),呈强正相关(r = 0.746, P= < 0.001)。功能层(CD105)的EC比基质层高0.9个点(95% CI [2.27, 4.11]);但相关性较弱,呈正相关(r = 0.429, P = 0.032)。功能层(CD90)的EC比基质层(Stroma layer)高1.4分(95% CI[2.1, 4.2]),但相关性为中度正相关(r = 0.547, P = 0.005)。独立样本t检验的结果表明,干细胞的EC Functionalis,下橄榄,基质层(CD105和CD90标记)是育龄患者(< 50年)比非生殖年龄的患者(50岁以上),一个统计上的显著差异(m = 9.6, 95%可信区间(5.3,14.6),(19.630)= 4.413,P < 0.001)], [(m = 10.2, 95%可信区间(5.2,15.2),(20.714)= 4.202,P < 0.001)]和[(m = 8.4, 95%可信区间(3.5,13.4),t (12.313) = 3.523, P = 0.002)]。综上所述,子宫内膜干细胞的EC随着年龄的增长而降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信