Accurate and Efficient Channel pruning via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit

Kiran Purohit, Anurag Parvathgari, Soumili Das, Sourangshu Bhattacharya
{"title":"Accurate and Efficient Channel pruning via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit","authors":"Kiran Purohit, Anurag Parvathgari, Soumili Das, Sourangshu Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1145/3564121.3564139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The deeper and wider architectures of recent convolutional neural networks (CNN) are responsible for superior performance in computer vision tasks. However, they also come with an enormous model size and heavy computational cost. Filter pruning (FP) is one of the methods applied to CNNs for compression and acceleration. Various techniques have been recently proposed for filter pruning. We address the limitation of the existing state-of-the-art method and motivate our setup. We develop a novel method for filter selection using sparse approximation of filter weights. We propose an orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) based algorithm for filter pruning (called FP-OMP). We also propose FP-OMP Search, which address the problem of removal of uniform number of filters from all the layers of a network. FP-OMP Search performs a search over all the layers with a given batch size of filter removal. We evaluate both FP-OMP and FP-OMP Search on benchmark datasets using standard ResNet architectures. Experimental results indicate that FP-OMP Search consistently outperforms the baseline method (LRF) by nearly . We demonstrate both empirically and visually, that FP-OMP Search prunes different number of filters from different layers. Further, timing profile experiments show that FP-OMP improves over the running time of LRF.","PeriodicalId":166150,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI-ML Systems","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI-ML Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3564121.3564139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The deeper and wider architectures of recent convolutional neural networks (CNN) are responsible for superior performance in computer vision tasks. However, they also come with an enormous model size and heavy computational cost. Filter pruning (FP) is one of the methods applied to CNNs for compression and acceleration. Various techniques have been recently proposed for filter pruning. We address the limitation of the existing state-of-the-art method and motivate our setup. We develop a novel method for filter selection using sparse approximation of filter weights. We propose an orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) based algorithm for filter pruning (called FP-OMP). We also propose FP-OMP Search, which address the problem of removal of uniform number of filters from all the layers of a network. FP-OMP Search performs a search over all the layers with a given batch size of filter removal. We evaluate both FP-OMP and FP-OMP Search on benchmark datasets using standard ResNet architectures. Experimental results indicate that FP-OMP Search consistently outperforms the baseline method (LRF) by nearly . We demonstrate both empirically and visually, that FP-OMP Search prunes different number of filters from different layers. Further, timing profile experiments show that FP-OMP improves over the running time of LRF.
基于正交匹配追踪的信道精确高效修剪
最近的卷积神经网络(CNN)的更深和更广泛的架构负责计算机视觉任务的卓越性能。然而,它们也伴随着巨大的模型尺寸和沉重的计算成本。滤波剪枝(FP)是用于cnn压缩和加速的方法之一。最近提出了各种各样的过滤器修剪技术。我们解决了现有的最先进的方法的局限性,并激励我们的设置。本文提出了一种利用滤波器权值的稀疏逼近进行滤波器选择的新方法。提出了一种基于正交匹配追踪(OMP)的滤波剪枝算法(FP-OMP)。我们还提出了FP-OMP搜索,它解决了从网络的所有层中去除均匀数量的过滤器的问题。FP-OMP搜索在所有层上执行具有给定批量过滤器删除大小的搜索。我们使用标准ResNet架构在基准数据集上评估FP-OMP和FP-OMP Search。实验结果表明,FP-OMP搜索始终优于基线方法(LRF)。我们从经验和视觉上证明,FP-OMP搜索从不同的层修剪不同数量的过滤器。此外,时序曲线实验表明,FP-OMP在LRF的运行时间上有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信