The Challenges of Social Sustainable Globalisation

E. Nieuwenhuys, D. Kort
{"title":"The Challenges of Social Sustainable Globalisation","authors":"E. Nieuwenhuys, D. Kort","doi":"10.1163/9789047409717_006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The world economy is globalising. World trade is growing at a faster pace than world income, indicating that countries are increasingly becoming interdependent on one another. According to mainstream economic thinking, globalisation is a good thing. One of the founding fathers of economic thinking, Adam Smith,1 already emphasized the importance of the labour specialisation and the exchange of surplus output as a source for economic growth. He pointed out that specialising and trading the surplus made sense for a private family and a country alike. The only limitation would be the extent of the market. The arguments for free trade and open economies were further elaborated upon by David Ricardo,2 who formulated the theory of comparative costs, which until today forms the very basis for the economic praise of the global economy. The level of modern analysis is more sophisticated than that presented by either Smith or Ricardo; however, modern analysis is also less explicit with regard to the moral and social consequences of economic policies. The classical writers addressed the political economy, rather than merely economics.3 Neo-classical economists generally regard economics as a value-free science and often consider that the process of liberalisation is a sort of natural phenomenon.4 Under this view, the globalisation process is ‘explained’ from the perspective of technological developments which","PeriodicalId":198770,"journal":{"name":"Neo-Liberal Globalism and Social Sustainable Globalisation","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neo-Liberal Globalism and Social Sustainable Globalisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047409717_006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The world economy is globalising. World trade is growing at a faster pace than world income, indicating that countries are increasingly becoming interdependent on one another. According to mainstream economic thinking, globalisation is a good thing. One of the founding fathers of economic thinking, Adam Smith,1 already emphasized the importance of the labour specialisation and the exchange of surplus output as a source for economic growth. He pointed out that specialising and trading the surplus made sense for a private family and a country alike. The only limitation would be the extent of the market. The arguments for free trade and open economies were further elaborated upon by David Ricardo,2 who formulated the theory of comparative costs, which until today forms the very basis for the economic praise of the global economy. The level of modern analysis is more sophisticated than that presented by either Smith or Ricardo; however, modern analysis is also less explicit with regard to the moral and social consequences of economic policies. The classical writers addressed the political economy, rather than merely economics.3 Neo-classical economists generally regard economics as a value-free science and often consider that the process of liberalisation is a sort of natural phenomenon.4 Under this view, the globalisation process is ‘explained’ from the perspective of technological developments which
社会可持续全球化的挑战
世界经济正在全球化。世界贸易的增长速度超过了世界收入的增长速度,这表明各国之间的相互依存日益加深。根据主流经济思想,全球化是一件好事。经济思想的奠基人之一亚当•斯密(Adam Smith)已经强调了劳动专业化和剩余产出交换作为经济增长源泉的重要性。他指出,对一个私人家庭和一个国家来说,将盈余进行专业化和交易都是有意义的。唯一的限制将是市场的规模。大卫·李嘉图(David Ricardo)进一步阐述了自由贸易和开放经济的论点,2他提出了比较成本理论,直到今天,这一理论仍是全球经济赞誉的基础。现代分析的水平比斯密或李嘉图所提出的更为复杂;然而,现代分析在经济政策的道德和社会后果方面也不太明确。古典作家论述的是政治经济学,而不仅仅是经济学新古典经济学家普遍认为经济学是一门与价值无关的科学,往往认为自由化的过程是一种自然现象在这种观点下,全球化进程是从技术发展的角度来“解释”的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信