Book Preview: Information technology standards: quest for the common byte, by Martin Libicki

ACM Stand. Pub Date : 1995-12-01 DOI:10.1145/219596.371845
Éric Jaeger
{"title":"Book Preview: Information technology standards: quest for the common byte, by Martin Libicki","authors":"Éric Jaeger","doi":"10.1145/219596.371845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cities catches the essence of Martin Libicki's book, where he demonstrates rather convincingly that continuing upheaval in information technology is, and will remain, \" standard \" fare. The underlying message revolves around a paradox that is central to the in-dustry's providers—the impulse to achieve common-ality is unquenchable, but the drive to innovate and achieve a proprietary franchise is just as strong. The constant dynamic between these two is the story of standards efforts, and the history that Libicki's survey describes. What are these things called standards? Simply speaking, an IT standard is an attempt to define some component of an information technology system in such a way that many users can use that component on offerings from multiple vendors and multiple sources to do something they want to have done. The rub, of course, is that there is no concurrence on what this definition means. To compound the problem , there is growing and increasingly acrimonious debate about what the nature and purpose of standards and standardization efforts really are. Should standards be driven by the end-users, by the designers , by the vendors of IT product, or by transient combinations of all three? Libicki introduces an interesting point when he analogizes standards with a common language. This goes to the core of the drive behind standards—it is a means to let users and their IT creations communicate meaningfully with each other. This is a truly laudable, ecumenical goal. Why would anyone oppose it? As Libicki describes it, however, not only do organizations and individuals oppose it, they do so for many reasons, nearly all of which are rooted in the tension mentioned earlier: the need for standardization and the drive for a proprietary franchise. Here is the heart of Libicki's book, which can be seen as a travelogue through the world of standardization efforts. This is a story so complex that it defies a simple analysis. In standardization every activity seems, somehow, to be part of an interwoven whole. This may be this book's greatest strength— that it tells a story and describes the processes of a number of standards efforts, from Ada to VHDL. Rather than attempt the futile task of a strict definition of IT standards, their processes, and effects, Li-bicki's survey defines by description and example. This approach avoids most of the arcane and endless discussions about definitions that seem to consume inordinate time and effort …","PeriodicalId":270594,"journal":{"name":"ACM Stand.","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Stand.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/219596.371845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Cities catches the essence of Martin Libicki's book, where he demonstrates rather convincingly that continuing upheaval in information technology is, and will remain, " standard " fare. The underlying message revolves around a paradox that is central to the in-dustry's providers—the impulse to achieve common-ality is unquenchable, but the drive to innovate and achieve a proprietary franchise is just as strong. The constant dynamic between these two is the story of standards efforts, and the history that Libicki's survey describes. What are these things called standards? Simply speaking, an IT standard is an attempt to define some component of an information technology system in such a way that many users can use that component on offerings from multiple vendors and multiple sources to do something they want to have done. The rub, of course, is that there is no concurrence on what this definition means. To compound the problem , there is growing and increasingly acrimonious debate about what the nature and purpose of standards and standardization efforts really are. Should standards be driven by the end-users, by the designers , by the vendors of IT product, or by transient combinations of all three? Libicki introduces an interesting point when he analogizes standards with a common language. This goes to the core of the drive behind standards—it is a means to let users and their IT creations communicate meaningfully with each other. This is a truly laudable, ecumenical goal. Why would anyone oppose it? As Libicki describes it, however, not only do organizations and individuals oppose it, they do so for many reasons, nearly all of which are rooted in the tension mentioned earlier: the need for standardization and the drive for a proprietary franchise. Here is the heart of Libicki's book, which can be seen as a travelogue through the world of standardization efforts. This is a story so complex that it defies a simple analysis. In standardization every activity seems, somehow, to be part of an interwoven whole. This may be this book's greatest strength— that it tells a story and describes the processes of a number of standards efforts, from Ada to VHDL. Rather than attempt the futile task of a strict definition of IT standards, their processes, and effects, Li-bicki's survey defines by description and example. This approach avoids most of the arcane and endless discussions about definitions that seem to consume inordinate time and effort …
《信息技术标准:寻找通用字节》,马丁·利比奇著
《城市》抓住了马丁•利比奇(Martin Libicki)这本书的精髓,他在书中相当令人信服地证明,信息技术的持续动荡是,而且将继续是“标准”票价。潜在的信息围绕着一个对行业供应商来说很重要的悖论——实现共性的冲动是不可抑制的,但创新和实现专有特许经营的动力同样强大。这两者之间的持续动态是标准努力的故事,也是利比基调查所描述的历史。这些东西叫什么标准?简单地说,IT标准是尝试定义信息技术系统的某些组件,以便许多用户可以在来自多个供应商和多个来源的产品上使用该组件来完成他们想要完成的事情。当然,问题在于,对于这一定义的含义,各方意见不一。使问题更加复杂的是,关于标准和标准化工作的本质和目的的争论越来越激烈。标准应该由最终用户、设计人员、IT产品供应商还是三者的短暂结合来驱动?当Libicki用一种通用语言类比标准时,他引入了一个有趣的观点。这涉及到标准背后驱动的核心——它是一种让用户和他们的IT创造相互之间进行有意义的交流的方法。这是一个真正值得称赞的、普世的目标。为什么会有人反对呢?然而,正如利比奇所描述的那样,不仅组织和个人反对它,他们这样做的原因有很多,几乎所有的原因都植根于前面提到的紧张关系:对标准化的需求和对专有特许经营权的驱动。这是利比奇这本书的核心,它可以被看作是一本关于世界标准化工作的游记。这是一个非常复杂的故事,无法用简单的分析来解释。在标准化中,每一项活动似乎在某种程度上都是一个相互交织的整体的一部分。这可能是本书最大的优点——它讲述了一个故事,并描述了从Ada到VHDL的许多标准工作的过程。Li-bicki的调查不是试图严格定义IT标准、其过程和效果,而是通过描述和示例来定义。这种方法避免了大多数关于定义的晦涩和无休止的讨论,这些讨论似乎消耗了过多的时间和精力……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信