Occupational exposure and sick leave in a local food industry company

Bogdan Mihail Pârvu
{"title":"Occupational exposure and sick leave in a local food industry company","authors":"Bogdan Mihail Pârvu","doi":"10.2478/rjom-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Sick leave (SL) medical certificates may help identify the intervention needed to reduce occupational exposures (OE) impact on employees’ health. OE may trigger increased sick days, but the question remains whether tracking medical certificates could improve health and working conditions. The objective of this observational retrospective cohort study was analyzing the SL situation for a local company in 2008, OE impact on future medical leaves during the next decade, and on all-cause mortality, towards improving global employee health. Methods: Employees of a local company were divided into two groups (G): G1-multiple OE including chemical hazards, rotating shifts, manual weight lifting, repetitive movements and machinery maneuvering (MWLRMMM), and G2-without OE. They were followed-up retrospectively between 2008-2018 regarding information from SL certificates, SL number, and all-cause mortality. Professional risk was assessed by professional risk factors identification forms, and on-site evaluation. Results: 369 patients (45.4% of all employees), mean age 33 ± 8.2 years old, 41.2% men, received 11310 SL days, 3036 days on the first certificate. G1 included 324 (87.8%), while G2 included 45 patients (12.2%). The most common OE, in 292 patients (79.1% of total, 90.1% of G1) was MWLRMMM. Sick days were significantly higher in G1 (p=0.046), while the association with MWLRMMM was almost significant (p=0.053). During the next decade, subsequent SL were significantly increased by the presence of OE (p=0.0023, risk ratio=2.4), especially MWLRMMM (p=0.0026). All-cause mortality was higher in older employees (p=0.025), and uninfluenced by OE (p=0.3194) or other parameters. Conclusions: SL are commonly prescribed, and OE is associated with more sick days, therefore improved working conditions may reduce SL. No association between OE and all-cause mortality was documented. Multiple sources of information (medical certificates, direct communication with employees and prescribing physicians) could lead to less sick days and a healthier work environment.","PeriodicalId":399083,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Occupational Medicine","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Occupational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rjom-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Sick leave (SL) medical certificates may help identify the intervention needed to reduce occupational exposures (OE) impact on employees’ health. OE may trigger increased sick days, but the question remains whether tracking medical certificates could improve health and working conditions. The objective of this observational retrospective cohort study was analyzing the SL situation for a local company in 2008, OE impact on future medical leaves during the next decade, and on all-cause mortality, towards improving global employee health. Methods: Employees of a local company were divided into two groups (G): G1-multiple OE including chemical hazards, rotating shifts, manual weight lifting, repetitive movements and machinery maneuvering (MWLRMMM), and G2-without OE. They were followed-up retrospectively between 2008-2018 regarding information from SL certificates, SL number, and all-cause mortality. Professional risk was assessed by professional risk factors identification forms, and on-site evaluation. Results: 369 patients (45.4% of all employees), mean age 33 ± 8.2 years old, 41.2% men, received 11310 SL days, 3036 days on the first certificate. G1 included 324 (87.8%), while G2 included 45 patients (12.2%). The most common OE, in 292 patients (79.1% of total, 90.1% of G1) was MWLRMMM. Sick days were significantly higher in G1 (p=0.046), while the association with MWLRMMM was almost significant (p=0.053). During the next decade, subsequent SL were significantly increased by the presence of OE (p=0.0023, risk ratio=2.4), especially MWLRMMM (p=0.0026). All-cause mortality was higher in older employees (p=0.025), and uninfluenced by OE (p=0.3194) or other parameters. Conclusions: SL are commonly prescribed, and OE is associated with more sick days, therefore improved working conditions may reduce SL. No association between OE and all-cause mortality was documented. Multiple sources of information (medical certificates, direct communication with employees and prescribing physicians) could lead to less sick days and a healthier work environment.
在当地一家食品工业公司的职业暴露和病假
摘要背景:病假(SL)医疗证明有助于识别减少职业暴露(OE)对员工健康影响所需的干预措施。OE可能会导致病假增加,但问题仍然是追踪医疗证明是否能改善健康和工作条件。本观察性回顾性队列研究的目的是分析2008年一家当地公司的离职情况,离职对未来十年未来病假的影响,以及对全因死亡率的影响,以改善全球员工的健康状况。方法:将某地方企业员工分为两组(G): g1组(包括化学危害、轮岗、手工举重、重复性动作和机械操作)和g2组(无OE)。在2008年至2018年期间,对他们进行了回顾性随访,了解SL证书、SL编号和全因死亡率的信息。采用职业风险因素识别表和现场评价法进行职业风险评估。结果:369例患者(占所有员工的45.4%),平均年龄33±8.2岁,男性41.2%,接受了11310 SL天,3036天首次证明。G1组324例(87.8%),G2组45例(12.2%)。最常见的OE是MWLRMMM, 292例(占总病例的79.1%,G1的90.1%)。G1组的病假天数显著增加(p=0.046),而与MWLRMMM的相关性几乎显著(p=0.053)。在接下来的十年中,OE的存在显著增加了随后的SL (p=0.0023,风险比=2.4),特别是MWLRMMM (p=0.0026)。年龄较大的员工全因死亡率较高(p=0.025), OE (p=0.3194)或其他参数不影响全因死亡率。结论:SL是常用的处方,OE与更多的病假有关,因此改善工作条件可能会降低SL。OE与全因死亡率之间没有关联。多种信息来源(医疗证明、与雇员和开处方的医生的直接沟通)可以减少病假,营造更健康的工作环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信