Sample implementation of the Littlewood holistic model for assessing software quality, safety and reliability

D. Herrmann
{"title":"Sample implementation of the Littlewood holistic model for assessing software quality, safety and reliability","authors":"D. Herrmann","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.1998.653698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software quality, safety and reliability metrics should be collected, integrated, and analyzed throughout the development lifecycle so that corrective and preventive action can be taken in a timely and cost effective manner. It is too late to wait until the testing phase to collect and assess software quality information, particularly for mission critical systems. It is inadequate and can be misleading to only use the results obtained from testing to make a software safety or reliability assessment. To remedy this situation a holistic model which captures, integrates and analyzes product, process, and people/resource (P/sup 3/R) metrics, as recommended by B. Littlewood (1993), is needed. This paper defines one such possible implementation.","PeriodicalId":275301,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 1998 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 1998 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1998.653698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Software quality, safety and reliability metrics should be collected, integrated, and analyzed throughout the development lifecycle so that corrective and preventive action can be taken in a timely and cost effective manner. It is too late to wait until the testing phase to collect and assess software quality information, particularly for mission critical systems. It is inadequate and can be misleading to only use the results obtained from testing to make a software safety or reliability assessment. To remedy this situation a holistic model which captures, integrates and analyzes product, process, and people/resource (P/sup 3/R) metrics, as recommended by B. Littlewood (1993), is needed. This paper defines one such possible implementation.
用于评估软件质量、安全性和可靠性的Littlewood整体模型的示例实现
应该在整个开发生命周期中收集、集成和分析软件质量、安全性和可靠性度量,以便能够以及时和成本有效的方式采取纠正和预防措施。等到测试阶段再收集和评估软件质量信息已经太晚了,特别是对于关键任务系统。仅使用从测试中获得的结果来进行软件安全性或可靠性评估是不充分的,并且可能会产生误导。如B. Littlewood(1993)所建议的那样,为了纠正这种情况,需要一个整体模型来捕获、集成和分析产品、过程和人员/资源(P/sup /R)指标。本文定义了这样一种可能的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信