CYCLIC AND TORSIONAL FATIGUE RESISTANCE OF THREE DIFFERENT THERMALLY TREATED NICKEL-TITANIUM ROTARY INSTRUMENTS

Rodrigo Ricci Vivan, Murilo Priori Alcalde, Thaine Oliveira Lima, Pedro Henrique De Souza Calefi, M. H. Hungaro Duarte
{"title":"CYCLIC AND TORSIONAL FATIGUE RESISTANCE OF THREE DIFFERENT THERMALLY TREATED NICKEL-TITANIUM ROTARY INSTRUMENTS","authors":"Rodrigo Ricci Vivan, Murilo Priori Alcalde, Thaine Oliveira Lima, Pedro Henrique De Souza Calefi, M. H. Hungaro Duarte","doi":"10.59306/jrd.v10e2202201-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nBackground: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cyclic fatigue and torsional fatigue resistance of three thermally treated rotary instruments, such as: Logic 2 25.05 (LOG 25.05), Edge Taper Platinum 25.06 (EDT 25.06) and ProTaper Gold 25.08 (PTG 25.08).Methods: A total of 60 rotary instruments of LOG 25.05, EDT 25.06 and PTG 25.08 were used (n=20). Cyclic fatigue tests were performed at 36°C using an artificial stainless steel canal with a 60o angle and a 5-mm radius of curvature. The time (in seconds) and number of cycles to fracture (NCF) was recorded. The torsional test evaluated the torque and angle of rotation to failure at 3 mm from the tip according to ISO 3630-1. The fractured surface of each fragment was observed by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Holm-Sidak’s tests for multiple comparison, the level of significance was set at 5%. \nResults: EDT 25.06 had highest cyclic fatigue resistance (time and NFC), followed by LOG 25.05 and PTG 25.08 (P<0.05). There were no significantly difference between LOG 25.05 and ETP 25.06 regarding the NCF (P>0.05). In relation the torsional test, the LOG 25.05 and ETP 25.06 presented similar torque (P>0.05). The PTG presented greater torque than the other groups (P<0.05). The PTG 25.08 presented the lowest angular rotation to fracture than the other groups (P<0.05). The SEM images demonstrated typical features of cyclic and torsional fracture. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":213881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59306/jrd.v10e2202201-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cyclic fatigue and torsional fatigue resistance of three thermally treated rotary instruments, such as: Logic 2 25.05 (LOG 25.05), Edge Taper Platinum 25.06 (EDT 25.06) and ProTaper Gold 25.08 (PTG 25.08).Methods: A total of 60 rotary instruments of LOG 25.05, EDT 25.06 and PTG 25.08 were used (n=20). Cyclic fatigue tests were performed at 36°C using an artificial stainless steel canal with a 60o angle and a 5-mm radius of curvature. The time (in seconds) and number of cycles to fracture (NCF) was recorded. The torsional test evaluated the torque and angle of rotation to failure at 3 mm from the tip according to ISO 3630-1. The fractured surface of each fragment was observed by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Holm-Sidak’s tests for multiple comparison, the level of significance was set at 5%. Results: EDT 25.06 had highest cyclic fatigue resistance (time and NFC), followed by LOG 25.05 and PTG 25.08 (P<0.05). There were no significantly difference between LOG 25.05 and ETP 25.06 regarding the NCF (P>0.05). In relation the torsional test, the LOG 25.05 and ETP 25.06 presented similar torque (P>0.05). The PTG presented greater torque than the other groups (P<0.05). The PTG 25.08 presented the lowest angular rotation to fracture than the other groups (P<0.05). The SEM images demonstrated typical features of cyclic and torsional fracture.
三种不同热处理镍钛旋转仪器的抗循环和抗扭转疲劳性能
背景:本研究的目的是评估三种热处理的旋转器械:Logic 2 25.05 (LOG 25.05), Edge锥Platinum 25.06 (EDT 25.06)和ProTaper Gold 25.08 (PTG 25.08)的循环疲劳和抗扭转疲劳性能。方法:采用LOG 25.05、EDT 25.06、PTG 25.08旋转器械60台(n=20)。在36°C下使用人造不锈钢管进行循环疲劳试验,管的角度为600°,曲率半径为5mm。记录断裂的时间(以秒为单位)和周期数(NCF)。根据ISO 3630-1,扭转测试评估了距尖端3mm处的扭矩和旋转角度。利用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察了每个碎片的断裂表面。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和多重比较的Holm-Sidak检验,显著性水平设为5%。结果:EDT 25.06的循环疲劳抗力(时间和NFC)最高,LOG 25.05和PTG 25.08次之(P0.05)。在扭转试验中,LOG 25.05与ETP 25.06扭矩相近(P>0.05)。PTG组扭矩大于其他各组(P<0.05)。PTG 25.08组骨折转角最低(P<0.05)。扫描电镜图像显示出典型的循环和扭转断裂特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信