Aesthetic multimodality of speech and gesture: Towards its functional framework

M. Kiose, A. Leonteva, Olga Agafonova
{"title":"Aesthetic multimodality of speech and gesture: Towards its functional framework","authors":"M. Kiose, A. Leonteva, Olga Agafonova","doi":"10.3897/lamo.2.78840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study develops a functional multimodal approach to speech and gesture behavior to explore aestheticism in more and less staged discourse of cinema and interview. We hypothesize that cinema and interview employ the same communicative functions; however, these functions constitute different frameworks which contribute to the higher aesthetic potential of cinema. This approach allows to study the aesthetic via communicative functions frameworks in multimodal discourse.\n To establish the function frameworks in cinema and interview, we apply a contrastive functional analysis of speech and gesture in the highly ranked actors’ argumentative and descriptive monologues. With the help of variance and regression analysis, we explore the distribution of pragmatic and discourse-structuring functions (with sub-functions) in speech as contingent on pragmatic, deictic, representational and adaptive functions of gestures. The study confirms that cinematic discourse exploits fewer deictic, representational and adaptive gesture functions, whereas pragmatic gesture functions (especially emphatic ones) appear more frequently and are contingent on several pragmatic and discourse-structuring functions of argumentative and descriptive speech. Interview function frameworks display lower predictability, which shows higher spontaneity of gestures; however, there are specific gestures typical of interview (self-adaptors) which may serve as indicators of pragmatic functions of argumentation. The study also manifests individual variations within the function frameworks. Overall, cinema and interview display variance in replication and regularity of speech and gesture functions, which presumably helps create higher and lower aesthetic effects.","PeriodicalId":121794,"journal":{"name":"Languages and Modalities","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Languages and Modalities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/lamo.2.78840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study develops a functional multimodal approach to speech and gesture behavior to explore aestheticism in more and less staged discourse of cinema and interview. We hypothesize that cinema and interview employ the same communicative functions; however, these functions constitute different frameworks which contribute to the higher aesthetic potential of cinema. This approach allows to study the aesthetic via communicative functions frameworks in multimodal discourse. To establish the function frameworks in cinema and interview, we apply a contrastive functional analysis of speech and gesture in the highly ranked actors’ argumentative and descriptive monologues. With the help of variance and regression analysis, we explore the distribution of pragmatic and discourse-structuring functions (with sub-functions) in speech as contingent on pragmatic, deictic, representational and adaptive functions of gestures. The study confirms that cinematic discourse exploits fewer deictic, representational and adaptive gesture functions, whereas pragmatic gesture functions (especially emphatic ones) appear more frequently and are contingent on several pragmatic and discourse-structuring functions of argumentative and descriptive speech. Interview function frameworks display lower predictability, which shows higher spontaneity of gestures; however, there are specific gestures typical of interview (self-adaptors) which may serve as indicators of pragmatic functions of argumentation. The study also manifests individual variations within the function frameworks. Overall, cinema and interview display variance in replication and regularity of speech and gesture functions, which presumably helps create higher and lower aesthetic effects.
Aesthetic语言和手势的多模态:走向其功能框架
本研究发展了一种功能多模态的语言和手势行为方法,以探索电影和访谈中更多和更少的舞台话语中的审美主义。我们假设电影和访谈具有相同的交际功能;然而,这些功能构成了不同的框架,这些框架促成了电影更高的审美潜力。这种方法允许在多模态语篇中通过交际功能框架来研究美学。为了建立电影和访谈中的功能框架,我们对排名靠前的演员的辩论性和描述性独白进行了语音和手势的对比功能分析。通过方差分析和回归分析,我们探讨了语用和话语结构功能(含子功能)在言语中的分布,这些功能取决于手势的语用、指示、表征和适应功能。该研究证实,电影语篇较少使用指示、表征和适应性手势功能,而语用手势功能(尤其是强调功能)出现得更频繁,并且取决于议论文和描述性言语的几种语用和话语结构功能。面试功能框架表现出较低的可预测性,这表明手势的自发性较高;然而,有一些特定的面试手势(自我适应)可以作为论证语用功能的指示。该研究还显示了功能框架内的个体差异。总的来说,电影和访谈在语言和手势功能的复制和规律性上表现出差异,这可能有助于创造更高和更低的审美效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信